Devices like lasers and other semiconductor-based technologies operate on the principles of quantum mechanics, but they only scratch the surface. To fully exploit quantum phenomena, scientists are developing a new generation of quantum-based devices. These devices are advancing rapidly, fuelling what many call the “second quantum revolution”.

One exciting development in this domain is the rise of next-generation energy storage devices known as quantum batteries (QBs).  These devices leverage exotic quantum phenomena such as superposition, coherence, correlation and entanglement to store and release energy in ways that conventional batteries cannot. However, practical realization of QBs has its own challenges  such as reliance on fragile quantum states and difficulty in operating at room temperature.

A recent theoretical study by Rahul Shastri and colleagues from IIT Gandhinagar, India, in collaboration with researchers at China’s Zhejiang University and the China Academy of Engineering Physics takes significant strides towards understanding how QBs can be charged faster and more efficiently, thereby lowering some of the barriers restricting their use.

How does a QB work?

The difference between charging a QB and charging a mobile phone is that with a QB, both the battery and the charger are quantum systems. Shastri and colleagues focused on two such systems: a harmonic oscillator (HO) and a two-level system.  While a two-level system can exist in just two energy states, a harmonic oscillator has an evenly spaced range of energy levels. These systems therefore represent two extremes – one with a discrete, bounded energy range and the other with a more complex, unbounded energy spectrum approaching a continuous limit – making them ideal for exploring the versality of QBs.

In the quantum HO-based setup, a higher-energy HO acts as the charger and a lower-energy one as the battery. When the two are connected, or coupled, energy transfers from the charger to the battery. The two-level system follows the same working principle.  Such coupled quantum systems are routinely realized in experiments.

Using decoherence as a tool to improve QB performance

The study’s findings, which are published in npj Quantum Information, are both surprising and promising, illustrating how a phenomenon typically seen as a challenge in quantum systems – decoherence – can become a solution.

The term “decoherence” refers to the process where a quantum system loses its unique quantum properties (such as quantum correlation, coherence and entanglement). The key trigger for decoherence is quantum noise caused by interactions between a quantum system and its environment.

Since no real-world physical system is perfectly isolated, such noise is unavoidable, and even minute amounts of environmental noise can lead to decoherence. Maintaining quantum coherence is thus extremely challenging even in controlled laboratory settings, let alone industrial environments producing large-scale practical devices. For this reason, decoherence represents one of the most significant obstacles in advancing quantum technologies towards practical applications.

Shastri and colleagues, however discovered a way to turn this foe into a friend. “Instead of trying to eliminate these naturally occurring environmental effects, we ask: why not use them to our advantage?” Shashtri says.

The method they developed speeds up the charging process using a technique called controlled dephasing. Dephasing is a form of decoherence that usually involves the gradual loss of quantum coherence, but the researchers found that when managed carefully, it can actually boost the battery’s performance.

Dissipative effects, traditionally seen as a hindrance, can be harnessed to enhance performance

Rahul Shastri

To understand how this works, it’s important to note that at low levels of dephasing, the battery undergoes smooth energy oscillations. Too much dephasing, however, freezes these oscillations in what’s known as the quantum Zeno effect, essentially stalling the energy transfer. But with just the right amount of dephasing, the battery charges faster while maintaining stability. By precisely controlling the dephasing rate, therefore, it becomes possible to strike a balance that significantly improves charging speed while still preserving stability. This balance leads to quicker, more robust charging that could overcome challenges posed by environmental factors.

“Our study shows how dissipative effects, traditionally seen as a hindrance, can be harnessed to enhance performance,” Shastri notes. This opens the door to scalable, robust quantum battery designs, which could be extremely useful for energy management in quantum computing and other quantum-enabled applications.

Implications for scalable quantum technologies

The results of this study are encouraging for the quantum-technology industry. As per Shastri, using dephasing to optimize the charging speed and stability of QBs not only advances fundamental understanding but also addresses practical challenges in quantum energy storage.

“Our proposed method could be tested on existing platforms such as superconducting qubits and NMR systems, where dephasing control is already experimentally feasible,” he says. These platforms offer experimentalists a tangible starting point for verifying the study’s predictions and further refining QB performance.

Experimentalists testing this theory will face challenges. Examples include managing additional decoherence mechanisms like amplitude damping and achieving the ideal balance of controlled dephasing in realistic setups. However, Shastri says that these challenges present valuable opportunities to refine and expand the proposed theoretical model for optimizing QB performance under practical conditions. The second quantum revolution is already underway, and QBs might just be the power source that charges our quantum future.

The post When charging quantum batteries, decoherence is a friend, not a foe appeared first on Physics World.

Imagine a smartphone that charges faster, lasts longer and is more eco-friendly – all at a lower cost. Aluminium-ion batteries (AIBs) could make this dream a reality, and scientists are working to unlock their potential as a more abundant, affordable and sustainable alternative to the lithium-ion batteries currently used in mobile devices, electric cars and large-scale energy storage. As part of this effort, Dmitrii A Rakov and colleagues at the University of Queensland, Australia recently overcame a technical hurdle with an AIB component called the solid-electrolyte interphase. Their insights could help AIBs match, or even surpass, the performance of their lithium-ion counterparts.

Like lithium-ion batteries, AIBs contain an anode, a cathode and an electrolyte. This electrolyte carries aluminium ions, which flow between the positively-charged anode and the negatively-charged cathode. During discharge, these ions move from the anode to the cathode, generating energy. Charging the battery reverses the process, with ions returning to the anode to store energy.

The promise and the problem

Sounds simple, right? But when it comes to making AIBs work effectively, this process is far from straightforward.

Aluminium is a promising anode material – it is lightweight and stores a lot of energy for its size, giving it a high energy density. The problem is that AIBs are prone to instabilities as they cycle between charging and discharging. During this cycling, aluminium can deposit unevenly on the anode, forming tree-like structures called dendrites that cause short circuits, leading to battery failure or even safety risks.

Researchers have been tackling these issues for years, trying to figure out how to get aluminium to deposit more evenly and stop dendrites from forming. An emerging focus of this work is something called the solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI).  This thin layer of organic and inorganic components forms on the anode as the battery charges, and like the protective seal on a jar of jam, it keeps everything inside fresh and functioning well.

In AIBs, though, the SEI sometimes forms unevenly or breaks, like a seal on a jar that doesn’t close properly. When that happens, the aluminium inside can misbehave, leading to performance issues. To complicate things further, the type of “jam” in the jar – different electrolytes, like chloroaluminate ionic liquids – affects how well this seal forms. Some electrolytes help create a better seal, while others make it harder to keep the aluminium deposits stable.

Cracking the code of aluminium deposition

In their study, which is published in ACS Nano, the Queensland scientists, together with colleagues at the University of Southern Queensland and Oak Ridge National Laboratory in the US, focused on how the aluminium anode interacts with the liquid electrolyte.  They found that the formation of the SEI layer is highly dependent on the current running through the battery and the type of counter electrode (the “partner” to the aluminium anode). Some currents and conditions allow the battery to work well for more cycles. But under other conditions, aluminium can build up in uneven, dendritic structures that ultimately cause the battery to fail.

To understand how this happens, the researchers investigated how different electrolytes and cycling conditions affect the SEI layer. They discovered that in some cases, when the SEI isn’t forming evenly, aluminium oxide (Al₂O₃) – which is normally a protective layer – can actually aggravate the problem by causing the aluminium to deposit unevenly. They also found that low currents can deplete some materials in the electrolyte, leading to parasitic reactions that further reduce the battery’s efficiency.

To solve these issues, the scientists recommend exploring different aluminium-alloy chemistries. They also suggest that specific conditioning protocols could smooth out the SEI layer and improve the cycling performance. One example of such a conditioning protocol is pre-cycling, which is a process where the battery is charged and discharged in a controlled way before regular use to condition it for better long-term performance.

“Our research demonstrates that, like in lithium-ion batteries, aluminium-ion batteries also need pre-cycling to maximize their lifetime,” Rakov tells Physics World. “This is important knowledge for aluminium-ion battery developers, who are rapidly emerging as start-ups around the world.”

By understanding the unique pre-cycling needs of aluminium-ion batteries, developers can work to design batteries that last longer and perform more reliably, bringing them closer to real-world applications.

How far are we from having an aluminium-ion battery in our mobile phones?

As for when those applications might become a reality, Rakov highlights that AIBs are still in the early stages of development, and many studies test them under conditions that aren’t realistic for everyday use. Often, these tests use very small amounts of active materials and extra electrolyte, which can make the batteries seem more durable than they might be in real life.

In this study, Rakov and colleagues focused on understanding how aluminium-ion batteries might degrade when handling higher energy loads and stronger currents, similar to what they would face in practical use. “We found that different types of positive electrode materials lead to different types of battery failure, but by using special pre-cycling steps, we were able to reduce these issues,” Rakov says.

The post Conditioning prepares aluminium-ion batteries for real-world use appeared first on Physics World.