↩ Accueil

Vue lecture

ASRO and Ethereal Space Partner to Advance Space Weather Instrumentation with ESA Commercialisation Gateway Support

ethereal space logo square

Turku, Finland — 29 August 2025 — ASRO – Aboa Space Research Oy and Ethereal Space, Inc. today announced a new strategic partnership to develop and deploy advanced space weather instruments designed to monitor energetic […]

The post ASRO and Ethereal Space Partner to Advance Space Weather Instrumentation with ESA Commercialisation Gateway Support appeared first on SpaceNews.

  •  

We led NASA’s human exploration program. Here’s what Artemis needs next.

Orion

The recent passing of retired Navy Capt. Jim Lovell, an astronaut and one of our great American heroes, propelled many of us back to the iconic scenes from the superb retelling of the Apollo 13 movie in 1995. The three of us lived through that fateful mission in 1970, as the astronauts and mission control team […]

The post We led NASA’s human exploration program. Here’s what Artemis needs next. appeared first on SpaceNews.

  •  

From ‘rewarding and exciting’ to ‘challenging and overwhelming’: what it means to have a career in intelligence and cyber security

GCHQ spelt out in Scrabble pieces on a chess board
Your next move? A career in intelligence can suit physicists with the right mindset. (Courtesy: Shutterstock/shaneinswedenx)

As a physics graduate or an early career researcher looking for a job, you might not think of the UK’s primary intelligence and security agency – Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) – as somewhere you might consider. But GCHQ, which covers counter-terrorism, cybersecurity, organized crime and defence support for the UK, hires a vast number of physicists. Indeed, to celebrate the 2025 International Year of Quantum Science and Technology, the agency has hosted many internal talks, informational campaigns and more.

GCHQ works with the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6), MI5, as well as the armed forces, a number of international partners, and firms in the private sector and academia. To find out more about a career at GCHQ – working with cutting-edge technology to identify, analyse and disrupt threats to the UK – Physics World speaks to two people with academic backgrounds who have a long career at the organization. They tell us about the benefits, the difficulties and the complexity of working at an intelligence agency.

Nia is the deputy director for science at GCHQ, where she has worked for the past 15 years. After studying physics at university, she joined GCHQ as a graduate and has since contributed to a wide range of scientific and technological initiatives in support of national security. She is a Fellow of both the Institute of Physics (IOP), which publishes Physics World, and the Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET).

Cheryl leads GCHQ’s adoption of quantum technologies. Following a degree in engineering, her career began as an apprentice at an avionics company. Since then, she has had many roles across research and development at GCHQ and across broader UK government departments, with a focus on understanding and implementing emerging technology. Cheryl is a Fellow of the IET and a Member of the IOP. 

When did your interest in science first develop?

Nia My fascination with science was nurtured from a young age, largely inspired by my parents. My mum was a physics teacher, and my dad is a passionate historian with an insatiable curiosity about the world. Growing up in an environment rich with books, experiments, and discussions about how things work – whether exploring astrophysics, geology or ancient Egypt – instilled in me a lifelong desire to understand our universe. My mum’s electronics, mechanics and physics lessons meant there were always breadboards, crocodile clips and even a Van de Graaff generator in the house, transforming learning into an exciting tangible experience.

Cheryl As a child I was always interested in nature and in how things work. I used to build bug farms in the garden and still have my old Observer’s books with the butterflies, etc, ticked off when spotted. Leaning towards my practical side of constantly making things (and foolishly believing my careers teacher that a physics degree would only lead to teaching), I took physics, chemistry and maths A-levels and a degree in engineering.

Could you tell us a bit about your educational background and your career path that led to you work at GCHQ?

Nia I was born and grew up in South Wales and attended a Welsh-language school where I studied physics, maths and chemistry at A-level. I then studied physics at Durham University for four years, before I started working at GCHQ as a graduate. My first role was in an area that is now the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC). As the cyber security arm of GCHQ, it researches the reliability of semiconductors in national security applications and uses that research to shape policy and security standards. This was great for me as my final year in university was focused on material science and condensed matter physics which came in very useful.

Cheryl My engineering degree apprenticeship was through an aerospace company in Cheltenham, and I worked there afterwards designing test kits for the RAF. It was almost natural that I should at least try a few years at GCHQ as a local employer and I had plans to then move to other R&D labs.

What’s it like to work here – what are some of the stresses of working in this kind of an environment and not being able to discuss your job with friends and family? What are some of the best aspects of working at GCHQ?

Nia Working at GCHQ is rewarding and exciting especially as we look at the most exciting developments in emerging technologies. It can also be challenging especially when navigating the complexities of global security challenges amid an unpredictable geopolitical landscape. There are days when media reports or international events feel overwhelming, but knowing that my work contributes towards safeguarding the UK’s interests today and into the future offers a strong sense of purpose.

The most rewarding aspect, by far, is the people. We have some of the brightest, most dedicated experts – mentors, colleagues, friends – whose commitment inspires me daily. Their support and collaboration make even the most demanding days manageable.

Cheryl At GCHQ I found that I have been able to enjoy several very different “careers” within the organization, including opportunities to travel and to develop diverse skills. This, together with a flexibility to change working patterns to suit stages of family life, has meant I have stayed for most of my career.

I’ve had some amazing and unique opportunities and experiences

Cheryl, GCHQ

I’ve had some amazing and unique opportunities and experiences. In the Cheltenham area it’s accepted that so many people work here and is widely respected that we cannot talk about the detail of what we do.

Fingerprint on circuitboard illustration
Safety net Maintaining secure communication and anticipating new threats are key to the work carried out at GCHQ. (Shutterstock/S and V Design)

What role does physics and especially quantum science play in what you do? And what role does physics play when it comes to the national security of the UK?

Nia As deputy director of science at GCHQ, my role involves collaborating with experts to understand how emerging technologies, including quantum science, impact national security. Quantum offers extraordinary potential for secure communication and advanced sensing – but it equally threatens to upend existing security protocols if adversaries harness it maliciously. A deep understanding of physics is crucial – not only to spot opportunities but also to anticipate and counter threats.

Quantum science is just one example of how a fundamental understanding of physics and maths gives you the foundations to understand the broad waterfront of emerging technologies coming our way. We work closely with government departments, academia, industry and start-ups to ensure the UK remains at the forefront of this field, shaping a resilient and innovative security ecosystem.

Cheryl I first came across quantum science, technologies and quantum computing around 15 years ago through an emerging technology analysis role in R&D; and I watched and learned keenly as I could see that these would be game changing. Little did I know at the time that I would later be leading our adoption of quantum and just how significant these emerging technologies for sensing, timing and computing would grow to be.

The UK national ecosystem developing around quantum technologies is a great mix of minds from academia, industry and government departments and is one of the most collegiate, inspiring and well-motivated communities that I have interacted with.

For today’s physics graduates who might be interested in a career at GCHQ, what are some of the key skills they require?

Nia Many people will have heard of historic tales of the tap on the shoulder for people to work in intelligence agencies, but as with all other jobs the reality is that people can find out about careers at GCHQ in much the same way they would with any other kind of job.

Maintaining a hunger to learn and adapt is what will set you apart

Nia, GCHQ

I would emphasize qualities like curiosity, problem-solving and resilience as being key. The willingness to roll up your sleeves, a genuine care for collaborative work, and empathy are equally important – particularly because much of what we do is sensitive and demands trust and discretion. Maintaining a hunger to learn and adapt is what will set you apart.

Cheryl We have roles where you will be helping to solve complex problems – doing work you simply won’t find anywhere else. It’s key to have curiosity, an open mind and don’t be put off by the fact you can’t ask too many questions in advance!

What sort of equality, diversity and inclusion initiatives do you have at GCHQ and how are you looking to get more women and minorities working there?

Nia Diversity and inclusion are mission-critical for us at GCHQ, gathering the right mix of minds to find innovative solutions to the toughest of problems. We’re committed to building on our work to better represent the communities we serve, including increasing the number of people from ethnic minority backgrounds and the number of women in senior roles.

Cheryl We are committed to having a workforce that reflects the communities we serve. Our locations in the north-west, in both Manchester and now Lancashire, are part of the mission to find the right mix of minds

What is your advice to today’s physics grads? What is it that you know today that you wish you knew at the start of your career?

Nia One key lesson is that career paths are rarely linear. When starting out, uncertainty can feel daunting, but it’s an opportunity for growth. Embrace challenges and seize opportunities that excite you – whether they seem narrowly related to your studies or not. Every experience contributes to your development. Additionally, don’t underestimate the importance of work–life balance. GCHQ offers a supportive environment – remember, careers are marathons, not sprints. Patience and curiosity will serve you well.

Cheryl It takes multidisciplinary teams to deliver game-changers and new ecosystems. Your initial “career choices” are just a stepping stone from which you can forge your own path and follow your instincts.

The post From ‘rewarding and exciting’ to ‘challenging and overwhelming’: what it means to have a career in intelligence and cyber security appeared first on Physics World.

  •  

Desert dust helps freeze clouds in the northern hemisphere

Micron-sized dust particles in the atmosphere could trigger the formation of ice in certain types of clouds in the Northern Hemisphere. This is the finding of researchers in Switzerland and Germany, who used 35 years of satellite data to show that nanoscale defects on the surface of these aerosol particles are responsible for the effect. Their results, which agree with laboratory experiments on droplet freezing, could be used to improve climate models and to advance studies of cloud seeding for geoengineering.

In the study, which was led by environmental scientist Diego Villanueva of ETH Zürich, the researchers focused on clouds in the so-called mixed-phase regime, which form at temperatures of between −39° and 0°C and are commonly found in mid- and high-latitudes, particularly over the North Atlantic, Siberia and Canada. These mixed-phase regime clouds (MPRCs) are often topped by a liquid or ice layer, and their makeup affects how much sunlight they reflect back into space and how much water they can release as rain or snow. Understanding them is therefore important for forecasting weather and making projections of future climate.

Researchers have known for a while that MPRCs are extremely sensitive to the presence of ice-nucleating particles in their environment. Such particles mainly come from mineral dust aerosols (such as K-feldspar, quartz, albite and plagioclase) that get swept up into the upper atmosphere from deserts. The Sahara Desert in northern Africa, for example, is a prime source of such dust in the Northern Hemisphere.

More dust leads to more ice clouds

Using 35 years of satellite data collected as part of the Cloud_cci project and MERRA-2 aerosol reanalyses, Villanueva and colleagues looked for correlations between dust levels and the formation of ice-topped clouds. They found that at temperatures of between -15°C and -30°C, the more dust there was, the more frequent the ice clouds were. What is more, their calculated increase in ice-topped clouds with increasing dust loading agrees well with previous laboratory experiments that predicted how dust triggers droplet freezing.

The new study, which is detailed in Science, shows that there is a connection between aerosols in the micrometre-size range and cloud ice observed over distances of several kilometres, Villanueva says. “We found that it is the nanoscale defects on the surface of dust aerosols that trigger ice clouds, so the process of ice glaciation spans more than 15 orders of magnitude in length,” he explains.

Thanks to this finding, Villaneuva tells Physics World that climate modellers can use the team’s dataset to better constrain aerosol-cloud processes, potentially helping them to construct better estimates of cloud feedback and global temperature projections.

The result also shows how sensitive clouds are to varying aerosol concentrations, he adds. “This could help bring forward the field of cloud seeding and include this in climate geoengineering efforts.”

The researchers say they have successfully replicated their results using a climate model and are now drafting a new manuscript to further explore the implications of dust-driven cloud glaciation for climate, especially for the Arctic.

The post Desert dust helps freeze clouds in the northern hemisphere appeared first on Physics World.

  •  

Radioactive ion beams enable simultaneous treatment and imaging in particle therapy

Researchers in Germany have demonstrated the first cancer treatment using a radioactive carbon ion beam (11C), on a mouse with a bone tumour close to the spine. Performing particle therapy with radioactive ion beams enables simultaneous treatment and visualization of the beam within the body.

Particle therapy using beams of protons or heavy ions is a highly effective cancer treatment, with the favourable depth–dose deposition – the Bragg peak – providing extremely conformal tumour targeting. This conformality, however, makes particle therapy particularly sensitive to range uncertainties, which can impact the Bragg peak position.

One way to reduce such uncertainties is to use positron emission tomography (PET) to map the isotopes generated as the treatment beam interacts with tissues in the patient. For therapy with carbon (12C) ions, currently performed at 17 centres worldwide, this involves detecting the beta decay of 10C and 11C projectile fragments. Unfortunately, such fragments generate a small PET signal, while their lower mass shifts the measured activity peak away from the Bragg peak.

The researchers – working within the ERC-funded BARB (Biomedical Applications of Radioactive ion Beams) project – propose that treatment with positron-emitting ions such as 11C could overcome these obstacles. Radioactive ion beams have the same biological effectiveness as their corresponding stable ion beams, but generate an order of magnitude larger PET signal. They also reduce the shift between the activity and dose peaks, enabling precise localization of the ion beam in vivo.

“Range uncertainty remains the main problem of particle therapy, as we do not know exactly where the Bragg peak is,” explains Marco Durante, head of biophysics at the GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research and principal investigator of the BARB project. “If we ‘aim-and-shoot’ using a radioactive beam and PET imaging, we can see where the beam is and can then correct it. By doing this, we can reduce the margins around the target that spoil the precision of particle therapy.”

In vivo experiments

To test this premise, Durante and colleagues performed in vivo experiments at the GSI/FAIR accelerator facility in Darmstadt. For online range verification, they used a portable small-animal in-beam PET scanner built by Katia Parodi and her team at LMU Munich. The scanner, initially designed for the ERC project SIRMIO (Small-animal proton irradiator for research in molecular image-guided radiation-oncology), contains 56 depth-of-interaction detectors – based on scintillator blocks of pixelated LYSO crystals – arranged spherically with an inner diameter of 72 mm.

LMU researchers with small-animal PET scanner
LMU researchers Members of the LMU team involved in the BARB project (left to right: Peter Thirolf, Giulio Lovatti, Angelica Noto, Francesco Evangelista, Munetaka Nitta and Katia Parodi) with the small-animal PET scanner. (Courtesy: Katia Parodi/Francesco Evangelista, LMU)

“Not only does our spherical in-beam PET scanner offer unprecedented sensitivity and spatial resolution, but it also enables on-the-fly monitoring of the activity implantation for direct feedback during irradiation,” says Parodi, co-principal investigator of the BARB project.

The researchers used a radioactive 11C-ion beam – produced at the GSI fragment separator – to treat 32 mice with an osteosarcoma tumour implanted in the neck near the spinal cord. To encompass the full target volume, they employed a range modulator to produce a spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) and a plastic compensator collar, which also served to position and immobilize the mice. The anaesthetized animals were placed vertically inside the PET scanner and treated with either 20 or 5 Gy at a dose rate of around 1 Gy/min.

For each irradiation, the team compared the measured activity with Monte Carlo-simulated activity based on pre-treatment microCT scans. The activity distributions were shifted by about 1 mm, attributed to anatomical changes between the scans (with mice positioned horizontally) and irradiation (vertical positioning). After accounting for this anatomical shift, the simulation accurately matched the measured activity. “Our findings reinforce the necessity of vertical CT planning and highlight the potential of online PET as a valuable tool for upright particle therapy,” the researchers write.

With the tumour so close to the spine, even small range uncertainties risk damage to the spinal cord, so the team used the online PET images generated during the irradiation to check that the SOPB did not cover the spine. While this was not seen in any of the animals, Durante notes that if it had, the beam could be moved to enable “truly adaptive” particle therapy. Assessing the mice for signs of radiation-induced myelopathy (which can lead to motor deficits and paralysis) revealed that no mice exhibited severe toxicity, further demonstrating that the spine was not exposed to high doses.

PET imaging in a mouse
PET imaging in a mouse (a) Simulation showing the expected 11C-ion dose distribution in the pre-treatment microCT scan. (b) Corresponding simulated PET activity. (c) Online PET image of the activity during 11C irradiation, overlaid on the same microCT used for simulations. The target is outlined in black, the spine in red. (Courtesy: CC BY 4.0/Nat. Phys. 10.1038/s41567-025-02993-8)

Following treatment, tumour measurements revealed complete tumour control after 20 Gy irradiation and prolonged tumour growth delay after 5 Gy, suggesting complete target coverage in all animals.

The researchers also assessed the washout of the signal from the tumour, which includes a slow activity decrease due to the decay of 11C (which has a half-life of 20.34 min), plus a faster decrease as blood flow removes the radioactive isotopes from the tumour. The results showed that the biological washout was dose-dependent, with the fast component visible at 5 Gy but disappearing at 20 Gy.

“We propose that this finding is due to damage to the blood vessel feeding the tumour,” says Durante. “If this is true, high-dose radiotherapy may work in a completely different way from conventional radiotherapy: rather than killing all the cancer stem cells, we just starve the tumour by damaging the blood vessels.”

Future plans

Next, the team intends to investigate the use of 10C or 15O treatment beams, which should provide stronger signals and increased temporal resolution. A new Super-FRS fragment separator at the FAIR accelerator facility will provide the high-intensity beams required for studies with 10C.

Looking further ahead, clinical translation will require a realistic and relatively cheap design, says Durante. “CERN has proposed a design [the MEDICIS-Promed project] based on ISOL [isotope separation online] that can be used as a source of radioactive beams in current accelerators,” he tells Physics World. “At GSI we are also working on a possible in-flight device for medical accelerators.”

The findings are reported in Nature Physics.

The post Radioactive ion beams enable simultaneous treatment and imaging in particle therapy appeared first on Physics World.

  •  

European customer leases SI Imaging Services’ SpaceEye-T

SAN FRANCISCO — South Korea’s SI Imaging Services announced a contract Sept. 2 to lease the capacity of Earth-observation satellite SpaceEye-T to a European customer under a contract with a value of more than 10 million euros ($11.7 million). SpaceEye-T, an optical satellite offering native resolution of 25 centimeters per pixel, reached orbit in March […]

The post European customer leases SI Imaging Services’ SpaceEye-T appeared first on SpaceNews.

  •  

Golden Dome for NATO is better than one for America

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and the NATO Heads of State and Government in The Hague on 25 June 2025. Credit: Emmi Syrjäniemi/Office of the President of the Republic of Finland

President Trump should invite NATO allies to join the Golden Dome Initiative, transforming the proposed Golden Dome for America into a Golden Dome for NATO. Such a shift would better match today’s security realities and send the clear message to potential adversaries that we are united in deterring and defending against nuclear and conventional ballistic, […]

The post Golden Dome for NATO is better than one for America appeared first on SpaceNews.

  •  

Garbage in, garbage out: why the success of AI depends on good data

Artificial intelligence (AI) is fast becoming the new “Marmite”. Like the salty spread that polarizes taste-buds, you either love AI or you hate it. To some, AI is miraculous, to others it’s threatening or scary. But one thing is for sure – AI is here to stay, so we had better get used to it.

In many respects, AI is very similar to other data-analytics solutions in that how it works depends on two things. One is the quality of the input data. The other is the integrity of the user to ensure that the outputs are fit for purpose.

Previously a niche tool for specialists, AI is now widely available for general-purpose use, in particular through Generative AI (GenAI) tools. Also known as Large Language Models (LLMs), they’re now widley available through, for example, OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Microsoft Co-pilot, Anthropic’s Claude, Adobe Firefly or Google Gemini.

GenAI has become possible thanks to the availability of vast quantities of digitized data and significant advances in computing power. Based on neural networks, this size of model would in fact have been impossible without these two fundamental ingredients.

GenAI is incredibly powerful when it comes to searching and summarizing large volumes of unstructured text. It exploits unfathomable amounts of data and is getting better all the time, offering users significant benefits in terms of efficiency and labour saving.

Many people now use it routinely for writing meeting minutes, composing letters and e-mails, and summarizing the content of multiple documents. AI can also tackle complex problems that would be difficult for humans to solve, such as climate modelling, drug discovery and protein-structure prediction.

I’d also like to give a shout out to tools such as Microsoft Live Captions and Google Translate, which help people from different locations and cultures to communicate. But like all shiny new things, AI comes with caveats, which we should bear in mind when using such tools.

User beware

LLMs, by their very nature, have been trained on historical data. They can’t therefore tell you exactly what may happen in the future, or indeed what may have happened since the model was originally trained. Models can also be constrained in their answers.

Take the Chinese AI app DeepSeek. When the BBC asked it what had happened at Tiananmen Square in Beijing on 4 June 1989 – when Chinese troops cracked down on protestors – the Chatbot’s answer was suppressed. Now, this is a very obvious piece of information control, but subtler instances of censorship will be harder to spot.

Trouble is, we can’t know all the nuances of the data that models have been trained on

We also need to be conscious of model bias. At least some of the training data will probably come from social media and public chat forums such as X, Facebook and Reddit. Trouble is, we can’t know all the nuances of the data that models have been trained on – or the inherent biases that may arise from this.

One example of unfair gender bias was when Amazon developed an AI recruiting tool. Based on 10 years’ worth of CVs – mostly from men – the tool was found to favour men. Thankfully, Amazon ditched it. But then there was Apple’s gender-biased credit-card algorithm that led to men being given higher credit limits than women of similar ratings.

Another problem with AI is that it sometimes acts as a black box, making it hard for us to understand how, why or on what grounds it arrived at a certain decision. Think about those online Captcha tests we have to take to when accessing online accounts. They often present us with a street scene and ask us to select those parts of the image containing a traffic light.

The tests are designed to distinguish between humans and computers or bots – the expectation being that AI can’t consistently recognize traffic lights. However, AI-based advanced driver assist systems (ADAS) presumably perform this function seamlessly on our roads. If not, surely drivers are being put at risk?

A colleague of mine, who drives an electric car that happens to share its name with a well-known physicist, confided that the ADAS in his car becomes unresponsive, especially when at traffic lights with filter arrows or multiple sets of traffic lights. So what exactly is going on with ADAS? Does anyone know?

Caution needed

My message when it comes to AI is simple: be careful what you ask for. Many GenAI applications will store user prompts and conversation histories and will likely use this data for training future models. Once you enter your data, there’s no guarantee it’ll ever be deleted. So  think carefully before sharing any personal data, such medical or financial information. It also pays to keep prompts non-specific (avoiding using your name or date of birth) so that they cannot be traced directly to you.

Democratization of AI is a great enabler and it’s easy for people to apply it without an in-depth understanding of what’s going on under the hood. But we should be checking AI-generated output before we use it to make important decisions and we should be careful of the personal information we divulge.

It’s easy to become complacent when we are not doing all the legwork. We are reminded under the terms of use that “AI can make mistakes”, but I wonder what will happen if models start consuming AI-generated erroneous data. Just as with other data-analytics problems, AI suffers from the old adage of “garbage in, garbage out”.

But sometimes I fear it’s even worse than that. We’ll need a collective vigilance to avoid AI being turned into “garbage in, garbage squared”.

The post Garbage in, garbage out: why the success of AI depends on good data appeared first on Physics World.

  •