↩ Accueil

Vue lecture

Secretlab Titan Evo League of Legends Themed Gaming Chairs Are on Sale Today

League of Legends fans, here's a chance to save on one of the best gaming chairs around and rep your favorite game in the process. Secretlab is currently offering coupon codes good for up to $90 off select League of Legends themed Titan Evo gaming chairs. All chairs ship free from the United States, arrive within 1-3 working days, and include a 3 year warranty (extendable to 5 years if you post a photo of your chair in situ on social media).

It's no secret that we love our Secretlab gaming chairs. Two of the six chairs in our best gaming chair roundup are Secretlab models. Of all the gaming chairs we covered in our "Budget to Best" roundup video earlier this year, my colleague Akeem Lawanson considered the Secretlab Titan Evo to be the most comfortable. No good chair comes cheap and Secretlab chairs definitely cost a premium, but we think the craftsmanship, materials, and customizability are worth it.

$90 Off These Titan Evo League of Legends Chairs

Note the sizes

$70 Off These Titan Evo League of Legends Chairs

Note the sizes

The Titan Evo is Secretlab's flagship chair and it's available in small, regular, and extra-large sizes. Upholstery options include Neo Hybrid leatherette, SoftWeave Plus fabric, or premium Napa leather. The chair features cold-cure foam upholstery for the seat, a supportive four-way lumbar system, full length backrest with 165 degrees of recline, full metal 4D armrests with magnetically attached PU cushions, and a memory foam headrest pillow.

Aside from the build quality, the Titan Evo also stands out thanks to the sheer number of officially licensed designs from popular video games, TV shows, and more. Some of the more popular examples include The Witcher, Overwatch, Attack on Titan, League of Legends, World of Warcraft, and Game of Thrones. They generally cost more than the standard colors, but they're worth it if you're looking for that extra personal touch.

Eric Song is the IGN commerce manager in charge of finding the best gaming and tech deals every day. When Eric isn't hunting for deals for other people at work, he's hunting for deals for himself during his free time.

  •  

Get a Lisen Car Charger with Retractable USB Type-C and Lightning Cables for Under $15

Need a handy USB charging solution for your car but don't want to deal with a rat's nest of pesky cables in your glovebox? For a limited time, Amazon is offering this Lisen 69W Retractable Car Charger for only $14.94 after you apply coupon code "CT2Q7HD9" during checkout. This little car charger plugs into a standard 12V vehicle socket and can charge any iPhone (including both new and legacy models). It comes with retractable cables so you don't have to supply your own cable.

Lisen 69W Retractable Car Charger for $14.94

The Lisen 69W car charger is relatively compact, measuring in at 5.9" x 2.64" x 1.38". It plugs into a standard 12V vehicle socket and can be rotated for optimal positioning. That's especially handy if your 12V socket is right next to your gear selector. There are a total of four ports. Two of the ports - a USB Type-C port and a Lightning port - are retractable cables that pull out to about 2.5 feet. They're useful for pretty much any Apple iPhone model, since you have a USB Type-C cable for the newer iPhone 15 and 16 and the legacy Lightning cable for the iPhone 14 and older.

Note that although the charger is marketed as 69W of charging, that is the total charging output across all four ports. The charging output of each individual port is as follows:

  1. USB Type-C retractable cable: 30W (PD)
  2. Lightning retractable cable: 12W
  3. USB Type-C port: 15W
  4. USB Type-A port: 12W

If you have an Apple iPhone with USB, then the USB Type-C port with PD will charge it at its fastest rate. ChargerLAB has shown that the maximum charging rate caps at about 30W, even for the Pro Max model.

Eric Song is the IGN commerce manager in charge of finding the best gaming and tech deals every day. When Eric isn't hunting for deals for other people at work, he's hunting for deals for himself during his free time.

  •  

James Gunn and John Cena Were Just as Surprised by the HBO Max Rebrand as Everyone Else

DC Studios Co-CEO James Gunn and other Peacemaker crew members seemingly found out Warner Bros. Discovery would be bringing back the HBO Max name while filming promotional material for Season 2 – and their reactions are priceless.

Minds were boggled when HBO’s parent company revealed it would be reverting its streaming service rebrand earlier today. It’s a move that will see apps ditch the Max name in favor of the original HBO Max banner this summer, and if you thought that was confusing, just know that some of the biggest names at DC have been left scratching their heads, too.

The soon-to-be-renamed Max's official X account shared recorded reactions from Gunn and Peacemaker star John Cena shortly after its announcement today. The pair appears to be reading from a teleprompter encouraging audiences to watch Peacemaker Season 2 when it debuts August 21.

As Gunn is telling viewers where to watch, we get to see him react to the name change in real time. Gunn is taken aback when the script he's reading from says HBO Max and not MAX. He's informed that it's not a mistake and will be announced at the Upfront.

That's good actually. pic.twitter.com/b3WNWOsyT2

— Max (@StreamOnMax) May 14, 2025

“God, we’re calling it HBO Max – what?” Gunn teases. “We’re calling it HBO Max again?”

At this point, we hear other crew members, including DC Studios Co-CEO Peter Safran, chime in. It’s a confusing (and hilarious) moment caught on film, but Gunn, at least, says he’s happy with the change: “That’s good, actually, but I didn’t know that was happening.”

Cena, meanwhile, is firmly in the loop. Instead of the footage showing the wrestler-turned-actor finding out about Warner Bros. Discovery’s latest streaming service rebrand, his video actually sees him breaking the news to some of the people behind the camera.

All of this could, of course, just be an elaborate publicity stunt orchestrated by the HBO Max team. Either way, it’s too funny seeing some of the most important names at DC Studios reacting to the streamer's latest rebrand.

POV: finding out about the rebrand from @JohnCena pic.twitter.com/eyQxhTcJrs

— Max (@StreamOnMax) May 14, 2025

HBO Max originally launched in 2020 and served as a hub for a variety of content to stream. It’s name stuck until 2023, when the newly merged Warner Bros. Discovery announced it would be ditching the HBO portion of its name in favor of Max. Now, after subscribers spent two years slowly working the one-word name into their vocabulary, the company has decided HBO Max is actually a great name.

No specific release date for the new rebrand has been announced. While we wait for an update on both HBO Max and Peacemaker Season 2, you can check out the most notable DC projects coming in 2025. You can also read up on our biggest takeaways from Peacemaker Season 2's latest trailer.

Michael Cripe is a freelance contributor with IGN. He's best known for his work at sites like The Pitch, The Escapist, and OnlySP. Be sure to give him a follow on Bluesky (@mikecripe.bsky.social) and Twitter (@MikeCripe).

  •  

EA Pushes Full Return to Office, Effectively Ends Remote Hiring

Electronic Arts has announced to employees that it will be ending its remote working policies permanently, and implementing a full return to office.

In an email sent to employees today viewed by IGN, CEO Andrew Wilson said that in-person work results in "a kinetic energy that fuels creativity, innovation, and connection, often resulting in unexpected breakthroughs that lead to incredible experiences for our players." He then went on to broadly outline that "hybrid work" would now be defined as a "minimum of three days a week in your local office," and that "offsite local roles" would be gradually phased out.

In a follow-up email from EA Entertainment president, Laura Miele, also viewed by IGN, she clarified further details, describing the company as moving from "a decentralized approach to a globally consistent, enterprise-wide work model":

  • These changes will not take effect immediately. Employees should continue working as directed by your Business Unit until further notice, regardless of where you live.
  • Work model transitions will come with a minimum 12-week notice period before any changes are implemented. The timing will vary by location and will be communicated locally with plenty of notice.
  • Hybrid work will mean working from your local office at least three days per week–this aligns with what’s outlined in Andrew’s EA Action.
  • We are introducing a new 30-mile/48-km radius around EA locations.
  • What this means:
    • Employees who live within 30-miles/48-km of an EA location will transition to a Hybrid work model.
    • Employees who live outside the 30-mile/48-km radius will be considered remote unless their role is designated as On Site or Hybrid.
  • We will also sunset the Offsite Local work model. Depending on your location, this transition may take 3 to 24 months.
  • Any work model exception and future Remote hires will require a CEO Direct’s /my approval.

Several sources within EA speaking to IGN anonymously said that employees were upset and confused, with some employees sharing hours-long commutes they were now being expected to make, or expressing concerns regarding childcare or personal medical conditions that had benefited from remote work. Others, classified as remote and outside the 30-mile range, expressed concern for what would happen to their roles if they were unwilling or unable to move closer to an office long-term. Two sources explained to IGN that per the breakdown sent by Miele, existing remote workers would have their "exemptions" to return to office "sunset" sometime in the next 3 to 24 months.

While remote work has long been prevalent in the video game industry, it became exceptionally popular during and after the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, when stay-at-home mandates forced most AAA companies to adapt remote work as a long-term solution. In the years since, more and more companies have hired more and more remote workers, and existing near-office workers have reported moving to cheaper cities away from offices, under the impression that remote work was permanent.

However, other major video game companies have recently been calling workers back to office, resulting in frustration and, at times, employee turnover as workers were forced to choose between expensive or challenging relocation and their jobs. Companies such as Rockstar Games, Ubisoft, and Activision Blizzard have all faced criticism from within and without as a result of these policies. However, the return to office mandates have appeared to move apace, with more companies such as EA opting to require an in-office model once again.

EA recently laid off around 300 individuals company-wide, following earlier layoffs at BioWare this year and the termination of around 670 roles last year.

IGN has reached out to EA for comment.

Rebekah Valentine is a senior reporter for IGN. You can find her posting on BlueSky @duckvalentine.bsky.social. Got a story tip? Send it to rvalentine@ign.com.

  •  

Save 40% Off the PowerBlock Adjustable Dumbbells and Expansion Kits

Bowflex isn't the only option when it comes to adjustable dumbbell sets. PowerBlock is another trusted brand at a much lower price point. For a few days only, Woot! (owned by Amazon) has discounted the PowerBlock EXP Stage 1 (5 to 50lb) adjustable dumbbell set to only $239.99, which is currently $149 cheaper than a comparable set of Bowflex SelectTechs. For those who need more than 50 pounds of weight per dumbbell, PowerBlock also offers expansion kits that can increase the maximum weight to 70 pounds or 90 pounds. Both kits – Stage 2 (50 to 70lb) and Stage 3 (70 to 90lb) – are also on sale at Woot! for $1199.99 each. Amazon Prime members get free shipping; everyone else will pay $6 for flat rate shipping. That's reasonable when you consider the fact that the package is going to weigh over 100 pounds.

PowerBlock Adjustable Dumbbells (up to 90lbs per Dumbbell)

Each dumbbell in the base PowerBlock EXP Stage 1 set is adjustable from 10 pounds all the way to 50 pounds. You can adjust the weight in 5-pound increments with just a turn of a dial, and the plates are all neatly contained and take up far less floor space than an entire rack of individual dumbbells. A stand isn't included; there's currently one on sale, but if you're on a budget, any sturdy stand or table will do.

One great feature of these PowerBlocks is that once you're ready to move beyond 50 pounds, you don't have to go out and buy an entirely new set of adjustable dumbbells. The expansion kits allow you to seamlessly add even more weight to your existing PowerBlocks - all the way up to 90 pounds - at a very reasonable cost.

The quality of these PowerBlock dumbbells are great. I've tried them myself and they are every bit as solid and well built as the Bowflex SelectTech. Just about every piece that matters is made out of metal, not plastic. The handles are rubber coated so your grip won't slip and the weight adjustment dial is smooth and intuitive. PowerBlock backs these dumbbells with a five-year warranty. If after five years you still haven't given up on your workout regimen, kudos to you.

Free weights are a great choice for anyone who wants to work out at home but is limited on space. A pair of dumbbells is all the equipment you need to get access to a wide range of exercises that can target just about every muscle in your upper and lower body. Supplement your free weight exercises with cardio and other workouts that use your own body weight as resistance (like pushups, burpees, or squats) and you may never need to purchase more equipment.

Eric Song is the IGN commerce manager in charge of finding the best gaming and tech deals every day. When Eric isn't hunting for deals for other people at work, he's hunting for deals for himself during his free time.

  •  

A Playable Legend of Zelda Ocarina Is Currently Discounted on Amazon for a Limited Time

You can now do your best Link impression with a playable ocarina from Deekec. The 12-hole handmade ceramic flute looks exactly how it does in the Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time and comes with a songbook with 20 iconic songs from the game, like the Song of Time and Song of Storms. It's on sale for $17.99 (10% off) at Amazon right now and is part of a Lightning Deal, meaning only a limited number of these are available at this price.

Grab a Playable Ocarina and Legend of Zelda Songbook

Aside from the ocarina itself and the songbook, you also get a neck strap, a protective bag for storage, and a nice ceramic display stand that looks incredible on any collector's shelf. The songbook includes songs from the entirety of the Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time's iconic library of music and comes with easy to understand instructions for first-time ocarina players, as well as real sheet music for more experienced musicians. There's also a quick visual guide on how to hold the ocarina properly before playing.

The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time is widely agreed to be one of the greatest video games ever made, and its soundtrack from legendary composer Koji Kondo is big reason for that. It also took the 34th spot on IGN's list of the Best 100 Video Games of All Time. After the Legend of Zelda: Echoes of Wisdom from last year, Nintendo has been hush-hush about what's next for the series, but we at least know a live-action Legend of Zelda movie is coming from Sony Pictures.

For more Legend of Zelda collectibles, check out all the official manga and encyclopedias that are more great additions to any gamer's collection.

The Legend of Zelda Manga

The Legend of Zelda Encyclopedias

Myles Obenza is a freelance writer for IGN. Follow him on Bluesky @mylesobenza.bsky.social.

  •  

Best Power Banks for Nintendo Switch 2

The Nintendo Switch 2 launches on June 5, and while you’ll obviously be able to take it on the go, Nintendo is only claiming a minimum of “2 hours” of battery life in intense games. That’s definitely enough for a morning commute, but if you want your Nintendo Switch 2 to last through longer flights or even just away from a wall outlet, you’re going to need a solid power bank.

While the Switch 2 does include plenty of new hardware features, it’s still just a mobile device that charges via USB-C. That means pretty much any existing power bank is going to be perfect for the portable console. Power banks that are specially designed for the Switch 2 will definitely be coming out over the next few months. Genki, for instance, has a magnetic power bank that attaches to a special Nintendo Switch 2 case to keep your Switch charged without needing to run a cable from your pocket to the console. There are similar solutions out there for the original Switch, but because of the Switch 2’s bigger dimensions, they won’t be compatible with the upcoming handheld.

1. Anker Nano Power Bank

The Best Power Bank

The Anker Nano 3-in-1 has a built-in USB-C cable, but you’re not limited to it. Right under the included cable is an extra USB-C port to plug in a second charging cable. This is awesome, as it not only allows you to charge two devices at the same time, but if the built-in cable dies on you, you don’t have to throw out the entire unit.

The Anker Nano also has a built-in wall plug, which makes it easy to just plug into a wall when you need to charge it without using an adapter. Don’t worry about it poking into your leg, though; it folds up and away when not charging.

While the Anker Nano is, like the name implies, a tiny little thing, it can charge the Switch 2 pretty quickly. This power bank is rated for 30W of output, and while that’s probably not enough to match the Switch 2’s power brick output, it’s still enough to charge it up fairly quickly. Not bad for such a tiny and convenient power bank, if you ask me.

2. Belkin Boost Plus 10K

The Most Portable Power Bank

The Belkin Boost Plus has been one of my favorite power banks for a while, mostly because it has all the cables sorted out to begin with. The unit has two cables built in, one USB-C and one Lightning. What’s more, they also stow nicely in little cutouts in the side of the power bank, making for clean storage. The Belkin Boost Plus’s Lightning cable is essentially useless for anyone with a Switch 2, though.

The only thing that really holds it back is that it doesn’t have any ports for other cables. This isn’t a huge deal most of the time, but if the built-in cables die, you’re basically screwed. At the end of the day you’re trading the flexibility of using your own cables for the convenience of built-in ones. That’s more than worth it for me, but your mileage may vary there.

With just 23W of charging output, this power bank will likely be a little slower than the included power adapter, but it’s sleek and easy to carry around. That’s worth it as far as I’m concerned. You’re not going to find many super-portable high-speed chargers, after all.

3. Anker Power Core 24K

An Absolutely Overkill Power Bank

For most people, trading off portability for the ability to charge your Switch 2 is enough, even if it’s slower than charging off the wall. But if you completely lack patience, as I do, you can just use a laptop charger. The Anker Power Core 24K is rated for 45W of output, which is enough to charge a MacBook pretty quickly, so it’s more than enough to at least match the presumed 39W charger bundled with the Switch 2.

There are a couple caveats to this, obviously. The original Switch didn’t really play nicely with fast charging. Not that high-wattage chargers harmed the Switch, they just didn’t charge it any faster than the dock would. I won’t know how well the Switch 2 gets along with powerful chargers until the system actually launches, but even if it has the same behavior as its predecessor, going a bit overkill on the power bank is at the very least not going to hurt anything.

The Power Core 24K also has a much higher power capacity than the other power banks on this list, with 24,000mAh. That’s a little over four times the capacity of the internal Switch 2 battery, for reference. Now, some of that power is going to be lost in the process of charging the Switch 2, but it’s still enough to charge the device at least three and a half times on a single charge.

Of course with all this extra oomph, the Anker Power Core 24K is both more expensive and bulkier than the other power banks on this list. This thing weighs 1.1lbs on its own, which is admittedly heavier than the Switch 2 itself. But hey, these are just the sacrifices you have to make sometimes, right?

Power Banks for Switch 2 FAQ

How powerful of a power bank does the Switch 2 require?

If the Switch 2 power adapter is anything like the original console – and there’s not much reason to think it won’t be – the console will feature a 39W charger. That means in order to match the charging speed of the wall charger, you’re going to need a beefy power bank. Most mainstream power banks have anywhere between 20-30W of output, so charging the system with a portable battery will be sacrificing a little bit of speed for portability.

Is a 10,000mAh power bank enough for the Switch 2?

Yes. The Nintendo Switch 2 has a 5,220mAh battery, which means a 10,000mAh power bank will have enough juice to fully charge the Switch 2 at least once, with enough left over to keep it charged for a little while longer.

Jackie Thomas is the Hardware and Buying Guides Editor at IGN and the PC components queen. You can follow her @Jackiecobra

  •  

Which OLED Display Type Is Best for Gaming?

I vividly remember buying my first OLED TV, the LG E8 55 inch back in 2019, right before we all went into hiding. Let me tell you: it was the perfect isolation companion. At the time, I didn’t really know what OLED (organic light-emitting diode) was like. I knew that instead of the backlight in LCD displays, OLED features self-lit pixels, which means infinite contrast. But after jumping onto the pretty boy train in Final Fantasy XV and fighting through scar territory in The Last of Us Part II, it hit me. This is what it feels like to live a nostalgic fever dream-like memory in real time. Naturally, I didn’t stop at the E8.

A few years later, I bought the LG C2 65-inch TV, and since then, I’ve reviewed tons of devices with OLED displays and learned that not all OLED screens are created equal. In fact, not all OLED displays even share the same technology. You might be wondering, “How many OLED types are there?” Well, too many. But there’s really only three you should care about: WOLED, QD-OLED, and AMOLED.

WOLED, QD-OLED, and AMOLED: How They Work

OLED has been around for decades, with companies from Kodak to Mitsubishi trying new takes on the technology. It wasn’t until LG debuted its OLED TVs in the early 2010s that the technology became mainstream.

LG’s variation of OLED is called WOLED (White OLED). The company doesn’t call it that in its marketing because LG is OLED, or so it would love for you to believe. But what is WOLED? As I’ve explained, OLED ditches the backlight and uses self-lit pixels. This gets you the infinite contrast and bold colors. The issue is the compounds in red, green, and blue emitters deteriorate at different rates. As you might know, burn-in is an issue for OLED displays, but this accelerated the process.

WOLED solves this issue by using a pure white OLED layer with a RGBW color filter. So imagine all of those self-lit pixels – they’re not red, green, or blue anymore, they’re just white. However, this has its own issues. Try blasting a spotlight through a bunch of color filters – some of those lights will be brighter than others. This causes imbalanced brightness and reduced color volume. (Pricier WOLEDs try to solve this with Micro Lens Array technology, which squeezes thousands of microlenses onto a single pixel to focus light.)

However, another solution made its debut in 2022, called QD-OLED (Quantum Dot OLED), which was heralded by Samsung. QD-OLED swaps that white OLED layer for a blue one, which hits a layer of quantum dot color convertors. The quantum dots aren't like the RGBW filter because they absorb the light, so when they convert the blue into red or green, they don't lose any of the backlight.

Meanwhile, AMOLED is in its own little category because it’s basically like WOLED except it features a thin-film transistor (TFT) layer, which helps control the charge of each pixel, allowing the pixels to be activated faster. However, that comes at the cost of OLED’s iconic “infinite” contrast.

WOLED, QD-OLED, and AMOLED: Which Is Better for Gaming?

The right OLED tech for gaming comes down to circumstance and preference. If you want the simple answer: QD-OLED is the best. However, there are some situations where you want WOLED, and some where you’re stuck with AMOLED.

First, let’s talk about AMOLED since I was just getting into how it’s in its own little category. Most AMOLED displays are typically found in smartphones and laptops. You won’t see them in many TVs because they’re expensive. AMOLED is flexible (literally, it’s used in foldables), so it can accommodate virtually any screen size and features high refresh rates and better viewing angles. But for the most part, you don’t have much choice in the type of OLED you buy on smaller devices, especially since the display isn’t the sole focus. (Ironically, for something designed for smartphone usage, they are the worst in direct sunlight because of their lower peak brightness.)

When it comes to gaming monitors and TVs, you get the choice of WOLED (marketed as just OLED) or QD-OLED. WOLED gets extremely bright because of its white OLED layer, but that’s only with whites. As I mentioned earlier, the RGBW filter loses a lot of brightness across its colors. So you get an overall brighter visual on a QD-OLED display. And since the quantum dots absorb light instead of filtering it through, you’re also going to see bolder colors.

But let’s go back to the white OLED layer that WOLEDs are rocking. I have my OLED TV situated in my living room across from my windows, so it gets plenty of glare. However, the darkest parts of the TV still look black. Meanwhile, my QD-OLED monitor that’s on my desk does not look black against glare. Instead it gives off a purplish tint. That’s because, in an effort to increase brightness, Samsung removed the polarizing layer from QD-OLED displays, which would normally reduce reflections.

For overall color and brightness, QD-OLED displays technically look better. But in a highly reflective space, WOLED screens are way less distracting. I will point out, however, that this is all in theory. The quality of the displays themselves really comes down to specs. You can’t get around the money factor – the more you spend, the prettier it will be, as a general rule.

But QD-OLED and WOLED may not be the only choices we have for very long.

The Future of OLED Is PHOLED

There are plenty of types of OLED. One of them is called PHOLED (Phosphorescent OLED), which uses phosphorescent materials (as opposed to fluorescent) to convert energy to light. The issue with this technology is that the blue in PHOLED has a significantly shorter lifespan than green and red, which makes a PHOLED panel pretty much DOA.

However, LG just recently announced that it’s overcome the challenge of blue PHOLED and is now ready for mass production. LG refers to PHOLED as “Dream OLED” and that’s because phosphorescence offers 100% luminous efficiency, surpassing the 25% efficiency of fluorescence. That means a PHOLED TV will be brighter and consume less power.

Unfortunately, we won't see PHOLED displays in TVs anytime soon. But we will get a glimpse of the technology in smartphones and tablets sooner than later.

Rami Tabari is a contributing writer at IGN with over 9 years of experience in the tech and gaming industry. You can find his bylines at Laptop Mag and Tom's Guide (and on a random Predator review at Space.com). When Rami isn't wading through a sea of the latest gaming tech, he's agonizing over the worldbuilding in his upcoming novella.

  •  

Mission: Impossible – Final Reckoning Review

✇IGN
Par :Kenny

Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning opens in theaters Friday, May 23.

For nearly 30 years, the stunts and action sequences of Mission: Impossible have been synonymous with big-screen spectacle. And as expected, the franchise’s newest entry finds Tom Cruise’s alter ego Ethan Hunt risking life, limb, and the fates of millions, this time in pursuit of stopping The Entity, the evil A.I. introduced in 2023’s Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One. But the way I see it, the sequel – which stopped being Dead Reckoning Part Two sometime in the last two years – might be trying a little too hard to top the IMF’s greatest hits.

First thing you should know about me is that I’ve always been a huge mark for James Bond movies. I’ve got a lot of formative movie memories from growing up with those films. So I was, frankly, thrilled to see all the things I loved about Bond captured perfectly in 2016’s Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation, the first of now four Ethan Hunt adventures written and directed by Christopher McQuarrie.

Rogue Nation nails the combination of go-for-broke practical stunts, grinning self-awareness, and just the right touch of believability that make up the most important parameters for a successful IMF mission – Fallout nails it slightly less, and I think Dead Reckoning misses by a wider margin. The Final Reckoning, unfortunately, has gone farther afield.

My biggest takeaway from the eighth and very evidently not final film starring Cruise as fate’s chosen lucky boy is that it’s extremely sober. The Final Reckoning veers into melodrama whenever there is story to be told. The cast, which is an assembling of familiar franchise faces and newcomer cameos, whisper-talk their way through soap-opera levels of tension. Nearly every scrap of dialogue is invested in no less than the end of all life on the planet.

But my first litmus test for these movies is how serious they treat Ethan Hunt getting the mission. Rogue Nation was a flirty encounter at a record shop, Fallout’s knock on the door woke him up from a dream where a nuclear blast interrupted his wedding, and Dead Reckoning was some kind of dramatic poetry slam with the IMF Oath and a new recruit. The Final Reckoning features a lo-fi delivery method thanks to the Entity’s infiltration of all things digital – and it’s honestly kinda fun. But the message is the most dire and serious thing. This is a story point introduced by Dead Reckoning: The Entity as a villain capable of literally every bad thing imaginable, like a laundry list of vague shorthand threats – any one of which could’ve been enough to carry a movie. Instead, they’ve all been lumped together in the form of a nebulous digital boogeyman, and reiterating that in the “this message will self destruct” section of the movie sets a very somber tone for everything that follows. Save for a few bits of humor here and there, it’s never shaken (or stirred).

Absurdly astronomical stakes are one of the biggest issues with The Final Reckoning. A good-old fashioned nuke or biological weapon – those live in Mission: Impossible’s sweet spot: life-and-death at a massive scale, while also real enough to be relatably scary. But all life on planet Earth is just too much to plausibly wrap your head around, particularly with how seriously everyone takes everything else compared to say, Rogue Nation or Fallout.

Absurdly astronomical stakes are one of the biggest issues with The Final Reckoning.

I know I keep swerving away from The Final Reckoning and back into the rest of the franchise but, for better and worse, this is a part eight that’s very aware that it’s a part eight. You can’t call a movie The Final Reckoning without delivering some degree of, well, finality, and oh boy does this one try.

It’s not merely planting Easter eggs from the earlier films so much as picking entire story points – largely unnecessary ones, I would argue. It’s a nice nod to the diehards, but when you consider the nearly three-hour run time and the relative lack of importance these moments have to the overall movie, I’m not sure what McQuarrie and Cruise were trying to accomplish. This is all to say, The Final Reckoning is impossible to review out of the context of the other seven Missions: Impossible, which is why I keep recapping my feelings for the franchise as a whole.

One of the callbacks that I really did enjoy, though, is a guy we’ve seen in the trailers for The Final Reckoning: William Donloe (Rolf Saxon), the poor bastard working in the CIA black vault whose nose Ethan stole the NOC list out from under way back in the ’90s. His part in The Final Reckoning is spot on. He’s a meaningful character for Ethan and the IMF to encounter who also speaks to the themes of the movie: Our lives are the sum of our choices. He’s fun, which is short supply here, and I would’ve loved it if he’d have been the only bit of retconning this movie tried to do.

But I’ve been talking a lot about the things I didn’t like – it’s important to note that there are some things The Final Reckoning very much did right. The action is predictably excellent, with the highlight being Ethan’s infiltration of the Sevastopol, the MacGuffin of a submarine that sank at the start of Dead Reckoning. It is incredibly tense and intricate and claustrophobic and all the other nail-biting things you want from a thriller. More than that, there’s clearly a huge chunk of the reported $400 million budget on screen, and Christopher McQuarrie is getting all the nautical miles he can out of it. The set is equal parts Avatar and the hallway fight from Inception.

The action in The Final Reckoning is predictably excellent.

The fight choreography is also elevated from previous entries, as other countries send their most special forces after the same prize Ethan is after. The fights are a little more brutal and legitimately feel like the IMF could lose. At this point in the franchise, that’s a difficult tightrope to walk, and McQuarrie and Cruise deserve a lot of credit for that.

They also deserve a fair bit of credit bringing the team together again. I felt that was one part of the Mission: Impossible formula that was a little absent from the last film. The climax of The Final Reckoning gives every team member a job – it’s reminiscent of Fallout in that respect, and very important for the IMF. Because it’s less fun when Ethan is running around doing everything himself. An abiding trust in his team is part of Ethan’s allure – in addition to being, as Shea Whigham’s Jasper Briggs puts it in Dead Reckoning, a mind-reading, shape-shifting incarnation of chaos.

The climactic biplane sequence is great, too. It’s thrilling in parts, funny in others, and most importantly, all the effort and planning that goes into a stunt like that is apparent. The only question I have about it is, would The Final Reckoning be worse if it were a stunt double walking out on the wing of that plane instead of Tom Cruise? Or would it just have one less interesting thing going for it?

A lot of how I feel about this movie, though, comes down to that subtitle. The Final Reckoning can’t be officially final with the way it ends, and I don’t think there are any of us who believe Tom Cruise is done risking his life for our entertainment. So it’s either the best subtitle for this movie, or the worst. Maybe they completely missed the mark on the “Final” part of the equation, and it’s not a representative title at all. Maybe its not-entirely-successful attempt at tying a neat and all-encompassing bow is the Final Reckoning for the franchise and the path it laid out across 8 movies. From a real world perspective, maybe a messy and self-serious capstone to an otherwise iconic franchise is exactly what they deserve and it’s a perfect subtitle.

Maybe a messy and self-serious capstone is exactly what Mission: Impossible deserves.

For my part, because again, I’m a big fan of this kind of movie, I’m rooting for the latter. Threads have been picked up and tugged on in different directions throughout the course of these eight films. That’s just the cost of doing business with a 30-year juggernaut of a franchise. Their mission now, should they choose to accept, is to take the clean slate they’ve created with all those threads tied up, however clumsily, and get back to what Mission: Impossible does best: not take itself so seriously.

  •  

Ultraman, The Hammer of Boravia, and The Engineer: Who Are the Villains of James Gunn's Superman?

The summer movie season is heating up, and all eyes are on James Gunn’s Superman. Anticipation for this big screen reboot continues to grow, with Warner Bros. releasing a brand new trailer that gives us a bit more insight into the movie’s plot and the relationship between David Corenswet’s Superman and Rachel Brosnahan’s Lois Lane.

But really, it’s all about the villains. The new trailer not only showcases Nicholas Hoult’s Lex Luthor, but also characters like María Gabriela de Faría’s Engineer, Gunn’s creation the Hammer of Boravia, and the mysterious Ultraman.

It all begs the question - who is really the villain of Gunn’s Superman? Is Lex taking a backseat to some of the DCU’s other baddies? Let’s explore the many villains featured in Superman and how these characters all fit together.

Who Is the Hammer of Boravia?

One of the newcomers in the latest trailer is a hulking, armored character called the Hammer of Boravia. Don’t worry if that name doesn’t set off any DC continuity alarm bells. In this case, Gunn isn’t adapting an existing character from the comics, but rather inventing an entirely new villain for David Corenswet’s Superman to battle. It’s an interesting choice, given how vast DC’s character library is and the fact that the large majority have yet to be touched by the DCU.

This character was actually first teased in some of DC’s promotional material for the film. A faux-Daily Planet newspaper features the headline “‘Hammer of Boravia’ Creates Havoc Downtown.” We seem to be seeing that conflict play out in the trailer, as the Hammer trades blows with Superman and unleashes a devastating laser attack.

It definitely appears that the Hammer of Boravia is relying on technology to even the playing field with Superman. This seems to be a soldier wearing a weaponized battlesuit. The suit reminds us of nothing if not the Zaku from the various Gundam series. Interestingly, Gunn has also referred to the various giant monsters in the film as kaiju. This suggests that the director and his design team have taken a lot of inspiration from Japanese media for their Superman villains, even as Superman himself seems to draw more from the classic Silver Age comics and the graphic novel All-Star Superman. This movie is shaping up to be a unique fusion of Eastern and Western elements.

Based on what Warners has revealed about the Hammer of Boravia so far, we know that this character represents the fictional nation of Boravia, which at the time of the film has recently invaded the neighboring country of Jarhanpur. Superman has just intervened to put a stop to that war, drawing the Hammer’s wrath upon Metropolis. We can see scenes of that invasion playing out in the trailer, and we also get a sense of the serious political fallout Superman creates by interfering in said war. Even the US Secretary of Defense is breathing down his neck.

This makes it clear that Gunn’s Superman will explore the challenges Kal-El faces trying to be not just a force for good inside Metropolis, but on the world stage. He’s doing his best to protect all innocents and creating an international incident in the process. In that sense, the new film seems to share a little in common with Zack Snyder’s Batman v Superman, which also dealt with the unintended consequences of Superman operating outside the boundaries of the US. Let’s just hope this doesn’t also result in Jimmy Olsen being shot in the head in the film’s first act.

María Gabriela de Faría’s Engineer

After barely appearing in the first teaser trailer, María Gabriela de Faría’s character The Engineer plays a much bigger role in this trailer. We get a closer glimpse of her nanotech-based powers, and it’s clear right away that she’s no friend of Superman’s.

It’s a bit of a role reversal for The Engineer compared to her comic book counterpart. In the comics, she’s a member of a superhero team called The Authority. The Authority are never painted as outright villains, but they are depicted as a much more proactive and militant alternative to the Justice League. They’re far less concerned with things like collateral damage or national sovereignty. In that sense, it’s easy to see why Gunn would want to include The Engineer, aka Angela Spica, in his film. The new Superman movie is all about the conflict between Superman’s brand of old-fashioned heroism and a new generation of more cynical heroes. We see that conflict embodied even in Superman’s costume, as the angular S logo is borrowed from the graphic novel Kingdom Come, which also dealt with such themes.

The new Superman movie is all about the conflict between Superman’s brand of old-fashioned heroism and a new generation of more cynical heroes.

But again, it’s up for debate as to whether Angela qualifies as a hero at all in the DCU. The trailer makes it plain that Angela is working for Luthor, and she seems all too eager to take on Superman in the field of battle. We see her battling the Man of Steel in the middle of a baseball stadium, and we also see her tearing into Superman’s loyal robot servants in the Fortress of Solitude. Even Krypto isn’t safe from her wrath, though he gets in a good hit of his own.

We assume that The Engineer, like Luthor himself, believes herself to be on the right side and believes Superman is a threat to humanity. Will she have her mind changed by the end? Possibly. We know that Gunn was at one point planning an Authority movie to spin out of Superman, though that project appears to have been put on the back burner. Still, we imagine Superman is the start of a larger storyline for de Faría’s character.

Is Ultraman in James Gunn’s Superman?

The Engineer seems to be looking for Lex Luthor in the movie, but we also see her fighting alongside a mysterious, masked character who’s been the source of plenty of speculation in recent months. Is this character the DCU version of Ultraman?

That’s definitely the prevailing theory, both because of the large U emblem on his chest and the fact that he clearly has the strength and durability to trade blows with Superman himself. But if this is Ultraman, the movie is definitely taking a loose approach to the source material.

Traditionally, Ultraman is a version of Superman from an alternate DC Universe. He hails from Earth-3, a world where the traditional dynamic between DC’s heroes and villains is reversed. In this world, Ultraman is the leader of an anti-Justice League known as the Crime Syndicate of America, a group that also includes Superwoman, Owlman, Power Ring, and Johnny Quick. Earth-3’s Lex Luthor is that world’s greatest hero. Outlandish as it may seem, we have to wonder if there’s an element to Earth-3 Lex in Hoult’s version. He obviously sees himself as Earth’s greatest hero, in any case.

With everything else going on in Gunn’s Superman, we highly doubt the film is going to be delving into the DC multiverse. It’s more likely that Ultraman is being reworked to become something more akin to Nuclear Man from 1987’s Superman IV: The Quest for Peace, or some versions of Bizarro from the comics. He could be a character who’s been genetically engineered to mimic Superman’s powers. The fact that we can’t see his face or any part of his body may mean he was horribly disfigured in the process… and is the perfect set-up for a dramatic reveal with Corenswet behind the mask.

Physically, it’s looking like Ultraman, not Lex, is the endgame villain of Gunn’s Superman. The Man of Steel will have to contend with a villain who has all of his strength and probably none of his morality. And if previous trailers are any indication, Kal-El is going to get seriously banged up in the process.

Superman vs. Kaiju

The new trailer showcases the massive scale of this superhero movie. At one point, we even see buildings toppling over like dominoes. As much as Superman is devoted to saving innocent lives, Metropolis may wind up with a body count to rival the climax of Man of Steel if he isn’t careful.

The problem is that Kal-El isn’t just fighting humanoid villains like the Hammer of Boravia and the Engineer in this movie. He’s also got a giant monster problem. We see him battling a kaiju that would be right at home in Legendary’s Monsterverse series or the Pacific Rim movies.

Another scene hearkens back to the original costume reveal photo Gunn released in 2024. That image showed Superman suiting up while a mysterious and very massive monster terrorized Metropolis in the background. That scene will apparently play out in the movie itself, though based on these trailers, we know that Lois Lane is also present. We’ll get to the unusual relationship between Lois and Clark in a bit.

The big question here is why Superman is fighting so many kaiju in the movie. Is there a reason these beasts are rampaging through Metropolis? Is this just an average Tuesday for the DCU, or is something (or someone) summoning them? Hoult’s Lex Luthor seems like exactly the sort of guy who would manufacture a kaiju crisis to make Superman look bad.

On that note, let's finally turn our attention to Lex Luthor himself.

Lex Luthor: Supporting Villain?

The trailer makes it clear that Superman will have no shortage of enemies to punch in his latest big-screen outing. But it doesn’t appear that Hoult’s Lex Luthor will be among them. There’s no need for Lex to don his iconic green and purple armor and take on Superman directly when he has so many other pawns who can do the dirty work for him.

Based on what we see of Hoult’s Lex in the trailer, he’s pretty traditional in his motivations. He sees himself as humanity’s savior, the only guy smart enough to lead mankind into a new era. He doesn’t like that the public has grown so enamored with Superman. He can’t abide the thought of humanity looking to an outside force to save itself when it should be looking to Lex himself. Superman is living rent-free in this guy’s head, and he can’t stand it. This Lex is so anti-Superman that he even refers to Kal-El as “it.”

Lex is clearly going to great lengths to discredit the Man of Steel in this movie. It appears he may even be working with ARGUS, suggesting we’ll see an alliance between Lex and Frank Grillo’s Rick Flagg, Sr. At one point, we see Superman sharing a superhuman prison cell with Anthony Carrigan’s Metamorpho and being beaten by prison guards. Apparently, Kal-El’s political crisis grows dire enough that he’s actually thrown in jail.

All of this suggests that Hoult is playing more of a supporting role in the film than fans might be expecting. Lex is still ostensibly the main villain of the movie. He’s Superman’s greatest arch-nemesis, and that’s never going to change, no matter how many times the DCU gets rebooted. But he seems to be working very indirectly in this film, relying on allies like The Engineer and Ultraman to do the actual fighting while he quietly works to tarnish the Man of Steel’s reputation.

Ultimately, Lex will probably still emerge as the final villain of Gunn’s Superman, but more in a thematic and emotional sense, whereas Ultraman is the prime physical threat. The movie will almost surely culminate in Kal-El proving Lex wrong and reminding the world that kindness, decency, and hope still have a place in our cynical 21st-century world. But don’t expect the two to settle their differences with fisticuffs. And don’t be surprised if Lex doesn’t wind up in prison by the end, but rather sticks around to play a recurring role in the DCU. His defeat will be an intellectual one, not necessarily a physical one.

Lois Lane and Clark Kent’s Relationship

While the villains definitely hog most of the spotlight in this new trailer, it is worth taking a step back to examine the dynamic between Brosnahan’s Lois Lane and Corenswet’s Clark Kent. The opening scene reveals that Lois already knows Clark’s secret. It makes sense. If she’s truly the intrepid, brilliant reporter she’s made out to be, Lois really needs to be smart enough to see through Clark’s flimsy human disguise.

That opening scene is somewhat reminiscent of the one in 1978’s Superman where Margot Kidder’s Lois interviews Christopher Reeve’s Superman for the first time. But in this case, Gunn is downplaying the romantic tension in favor of allowing Lois to really grill Clark on the political fallout of Superman’s actions. Again, she’s a reporter first and a love interest second.

On that note, it’s enough to wonder just what the state of Lois and Clark’s relationship is in this movie. In the comics, Clark only revealed his secret to Lois after they had already fallen in love. But here, she’s already figured it out. The tone of that interview scene suggests that the two are close friends, but not necessarily lovers yet. Though as we see from their dramatic kiss later in the trailer, that will apparently change over the course of the film.

Gunn spoke about the Lois/Clark dynamic when IGN visited the set of the film in 2024, saying “It's a complicated relationship and we really get into it and there's long scenes that are about their relationship and the way they relate and what it would be like for a person, who's this incredibly intelligent, strong-headed, stubborn, skeptical journalist, to have a relationship with someone who can lift a skyscraper.”

One thing is clear - despite the fact that Superman will be contending with villains both human and monster in the movie, Gunn is intent on preventing Lois from falling into the same damsel-in-distress trap that she so often has in past Superman adaptations. This is a character who, intellectually, can hold her own against Superman every bit as easily as Lex Luthor.

Who do you think is the real endgame villain of Gunn’s Superman? Which epic superhero battle are you most excited to see? Let us know what you think in the comments.

For more on the future of the DCU, see every DC movie and series in development.

Jesse is a mild-mannered staff writer for IGN. Allow him to lend a machete to your intellectual thicket by following @jschedeen on BlueSky.

  •  

The First Star Wars Book to Explore the Post-Rise of Skywalker Universe Is Up for Preorder

You can preorder the next Star Wars novel right now at Amazon and Barnes & Noble. New York Times best-selling author Kwame Mbalia enters the galaxy far, far away with the young adult novel Star Wars: The Last Order, the first time in Star Wars continuity where we get to see a post-Rise of Skywalker universe, even before the upcoming Shawn Levy film Star Wars: Starfighter. The 464-page hardcover book will run you $18.99 and releases on October 21, 2025. It does not yet have a cover you can check out, but it will likely be revealed soon now that preorder listings are live.

Preorder Star Wars: The Last Order by Kwame Mbalia

Star Wars: The Last Order follows former Stormtroopers Finn and Jannah after the events of Star Wars Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker. Still a part of the Resistance, the pair rescue a ship of young passengers who were kidnapped by a First Order officer for reasons unknown. Their goal is to track down the officer before he can do anymore harm to other children, and along the way they may confront their own intricate pasts. While no official artwork or even a cover are available to see yet, Star Wars: The Last Order will be a "richly drawn" adventure, according to publisher Penguin Random House.

Star Wars Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker is the most recent chronological entry into the vast Star Wars timeline. Since then, we've seen countless other shows explore the already established timeframe, with not much known after this film. We gave the final film of the Skywalker Saga a 7, saying in our review that it's "an entertaining but deeply flawed final chapter that ultimately plays it too safe."

More books by Kwame Mbalia

Kwame Mbalia's previous work includes the Tristan Strong trilogy, Black Boy Joy: 17 Stories Celebrating Black Boyhood, The Cursed Carnival and Other Calamities, and so much more. Many of his books are currently on sale on Amazon, as well.

What Is Amazon's Preorder Price Guarantee?

If you've never actually preordered anything from Amazon before, it's worth noting that if you purchase the illustrated edition of this book at Amazon, it includes a preorder price guarantee. According to Amazon's own help page, this means that if the price decreases between now and when the item ships, you'll pay the lowest price.

This is one of the reasons Amazon is overally one of the best places to buy books before they actually release. Many popular books will receive discounts before their release date, so having a guarantee you'll still get those even if you lock in your preorder now is hard to pass up.

Myles Obenza is a freelance writer for IGN. Follow him on Bluesky @mylesobenza.bsky.social.

  •  

A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms: Game of Thrones Spin-Off Delayed Until 2026

The release of Game of Thrones spinoff and The Hedge Knight adaptation A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms has been delayed until 2026.

Per Variety, Warner Bros. Discovery revealed that the show’s 2025 release date has been pushed to next year as part of its Upfront showcase in New York today. The announcement arrived toward the end of a new trailer which has yet to be made available to the public, so while the latest Game of Thrones series is making progress, it will remain in the oven a little longer before it officially premieres.

While this delay means we'll have to wait until next year to see the show, HBO Content Chairman and CEO Casey Bloys clarified that the series is still expected to release in the winter, suggesting an early 2026 premiere.

A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms has been an especially exciting part of HBO’s slate of upcoming shows set in the world of Westeros, as original author George R. R. Martin teased earlier this year that he couldn’t wait to see Dunk and Egg’s story come to TV screens.

“I’ve seen all six episodes now (the last two in rough cuts, admittedly), and I loved them," Martin said in a blog post in January. "Dunk and Egg have always been favorites of mine, and the actors we found to portray them are just incredible. The rest of the cast are terrific as well. Wait until you guys meet the Laughing Storm and Tanselle Too-Tall.”

Martin continued to celebrate A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms, adding, “It’s as faithful as adaptation as a reasonable man could hope for (and you all know how incredibly reasonable I am on that particular subject).”

Despite Martin’s towering praise, we’ve seen little from the show since it was announced in 2021. After locking in actors Peter Claffey and Dexter Sol Ansell to play Ser Duncan the Tall and Egg, respectively, HBO went on to reveal one image from the show in June 2024. A brief teaser trailer then followed in August, showing a glimpse at some of the series’ major players and a few shots of familiar Game of Thrones action.

We’ll have a better look at A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms as we move closer to 2026. When it eventually arrives, it will be available to stream on Warner Bros. Discovery’s renamed service, HBO Max. The company announced plans to revert its branding switch-up earlier today. For more while we wait, you can check out everything you need to know about A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms here.

Michael Cripe is a freelance contributor with IGN. He's best known for his work at sites like The Pitch, The Escapist, and OnlySP. Be sure to give him a follow on Bluesky (@mikecripe.bsky.social) and Twitter (@MikeCripe).

  •  

The 7 Best VPNs in 2025: Our Tested & Reviewed Top Picks

Having spent nearly a decade testing VPNs, there’s one thing that was crystal clear to me from the outset that remains true today: Not all VPNs are created equal. Some boast powerful unblocking and seamless streaming, while others offer a more robust security setup or a stronger stance on privacy. These VPNs are available at prices to suit all budget levels too – some are even free.

The challenge is finding the best VPN for your specific needs. To make this easier, I’ve run dozens of VPNs through a series of tests to see where they excel and, crucially, where they fall short. This includes measuring server speeds, accessing streaming services from abroad, checking for DNS leaks, reading privacy policies, and even contacting each VPN’s support to gauge response time and quality. It’s about as comprehensive an approach as there is, resulting in a fair and accurate picture of the very best VPN services in 2025.

TL;DR: These Are the Best VPN Services:

Still not sure exactly what a VPN is or how it works? Short for Virtual Private Network, a VPN is a service you can use to encrypt your internet connection and spoof your virtual location. When you connect to a VPN, it routes your traffic via a secure, encrypted tunnel to a server in your preferred location. The encryption provides security from hackers and snoopers but, in hiding your IP address, a VPN also allows you to sidestep annoying geographic restrictions on content.

1. Proton VPN

The Best VPN

Proton VPN simply does it all. It’s fast, has a huge server network, is a reliable unblocker, and does all this without compromising in terms of security or privacy. At the time of writing, Proton VPN offers more than 12,000 servers in 117 countries. This makes it very easy to not just find a fast server close to your location (and Proton VPN is very fast indeed), but to bypass geo-blocking of websites and services. I found it worked very well with Netflix in testing.

Although Proton VPN’s MacOS app is not quite as easy on the eye as, say, that of ExpressVPN, it’s nonetheless easy to use. What’s more, Proton VPN’s Windows, Android, and iOS apps have recently had a welcome facelift and they’re more intuitive to navigate as a result. Proton VPN has a strong set of security features and sets itself apart from rivals with what is a true no-logs policy. It’s also one of very few VPNs to let you pay anonymously in cash should you like.

2. ExpressVPN

Best VPN for Streaming

ExpressVPN is a worthy runner-up and is also our best VPN for streaming. In my review, I found that this is just a great all-rounder that’s beginner-friendly while still packing fast speeds and powerful unblocking. Its 3,000 servers is fewer than Proton VPN and NordVPN but they cover 105 countries. Moreover, connections are high-speed without interruptions, proving there’s no server load issues. I’ve found ExpressVPN to be one of the most consistent unblockers of popular streaming services.

During testing, I connected to various ExpressVPN servers and observed no DNS or IP leaks. 256-bit AES encryption secures your connection and the kill switch works exactly as it should. Although ExpressVPN doesn’t have as many extras as Surfshark, one of the most feature-rich VPN services, it does still have some intriguing features including a password manager. There’s a 10-device connection limit but you can bypass this by setting ExpressVPN with your router, which is easy thanks to the availability of custom firmware.

3. NordVPN

Best VPN for Gaming

NordVPN is one of the biggest names in the VPN space and its reputation is well deserved as I found in my review. Its network of over 7,000 servers in 118 countries is among the largest. If you’re in the U.S., know that some 2,000 of these servers cover 16 U.S. cities. It’s little wonder then that NordVPN worked so well with U.S. Netflix and Peacock in my unblocking tests. NordVPN’s proprietary NordLynx protocol allows for almost unrivaled speeds, which is a reason why it’s the best VPN for gaming.

Unlike some VPNs, NordVPN doesn’t stand still. It receives regular updates and new features. An entry-level NordVPN subscription includes all of the security essentials you’d expect. Tier up from this however and you’ll gain access to Threat Protection Pro, which serves to block ads, trackers, and malicious websites. You’ll also find a password manager and data breach scanner. The server map view of the apps won’t be for everyone, but the apps are still very accessible.

4. Surfshark

Best VPN for Extra Features

Surfshark doesn’t impose a limit on the number of devices you can connect simultaneously. This makes it ideal if you’ve got a lot of internet-connected devices at home to secure. Over 3,000 servers are offered in 100 countries. Notably, Surfshark has servers in almost two dozen U.S. cities. Having connected to these servers and streamed HBO Max and Prime Video and played games like Fortnite and Helldivers 2 from my review testing, I can confirm that they’re more than fast enough.

Aside from impressive performance, Surfshark ticks every security box. There’s 256-bit AES encryption (OpenVPN) and ChaCha20 encryption (WireGuard), DNS and IPv6 leak protection, and a kill switch. If that’s not enough, Surfshark’s MultiHop servers can provide an extra layer of encryption. Then there’s the many extras, be it the new Alternative ID (email masking) or a highly impressive antivirus. Plans start from $1.99, but the one-month plans are very expensive.

5. IPVanish

Best VPN for Unlimited Devices

IPVanish continues to add to its server network, which now stands at 2,400 servers, over 1,400 of which are in North America. As such, this is a highly reliable choice for streaming services like U.S. Netflix and Hulu. Having run speed tests on IPVanish servers in the U.S., UK, and Japan in my review testing, I was impressed by the speeds on offer. IPVanish has made great progress in this respect and it means that streaming is lag-free while online gaming sessions don’t suffer from high ping.

Planning on sharing your VPN with family or friends at home? IPVanish is one of just two VPNs covered here that allows unlimited simultaneous connections. Two different subscription tiers are offered, and both include Threat Protection which blocks ads, trackers and malicious websites. Only the Advanced tier includes new IPVanish features like a secure browser and cloud storage. IPVanish does lack a Smart DNS feature however, and there’s no browser extensions either.

Disclosure: IPVanish is owned by Ziff Davis, IGN's parent company.

6. CyberGhost

Best VPN with a Free Trial

CyberGhost is not only one of the best VPNs available, it’s also one of the most accessible. Apps are available for desktop, mobile, and Amazon Fire TV, as are browser extensions for Chrome. Better still, I found them to be very easy to use in my review and particularly appreciated seeing each server’s load in the desktop apps. CyberGhost no longer publishes its server count, but with servers in 100 countries, it’s like it still has one of the largest networks of any VPN.

Another area in which CyberGhost stands out from the competition is its 45-day money-back guarantee (most VPNs offer 30 days). There’s even a 24-hour free trial available for both Windows and MacOS. Better still, you don’t need to provide a credit card to take advantage. Where CyberGhost is lagging is in terms of advanced features with no Double VPN servers or port forwarding. It’s one of the few top VPNs that still hasn’t introduced an Apple TV app either.

7. Mullvad

Best VPN for Anonymity

Mullvad is the VPN for you if you’re concerned about privacy above all else. Although it uses the WireGuard protocol and is one of the fastest VPNs, I don’t recommend it for streaming due to its lack of unblocking ability. It also offers far fewer servers and server locations than most major providers. Yet none of that is Mullvad’s primary focus. Instead, it puts security and privacy first, as evidenced by its comprehensive set of security features and strict no-logs policy.

Where Mullvad really stands out though is that it’s possible to sign up for the service entirely anonymously. It doesn’t ask for an email address during signup, instead generating a random account number for you. Available for a flat monthly rate of just €5 (about $5.65 as of writing), it accepts not only cash but Monero, which is one of the most privacy-friendly cryptocurrencies in existence. There’s not a wealth of features however, and live chat support is also absent.

How We Picked the Best VPN Services

You’d think that with so many VPN services available, whittling them down to just seven would be no easy task. Yet it’s not as challenging as you might think when you know what to look for:

  • Fast, consistent connections: A VPN shouldn’t slow your connection significantly. For each VPN, I connected to three server locations and measured speeds at different times of day over several days. This helped create a more reliable average. I also streamed content and played games (yes, it still counts as work!) to make sure there were no performance issues during more bandwidth-heavy tasks.
  • Strong unblocking ability: Most quality VPNs have servers in dozens of countries around the world. Not only does this make it easier to find a server close to your location for a faster connection, it provides more flexibility when it comes to unblocking geo-restricted online content. Streaming platforms are commonly region-locked, so I test each VPN’s servers against them to see how they fare.
  • Keeps data secure: For any VPN service to be taken seriously, it must use strong encryption to safeguard your internet traffic. This should be 256-bit AES if using the OpenVPN protocol or ChaCha20 if on WireGuard. Not content to simply assume protection is set up correctly, I run DNS and IP leak tests to make sure absolutely no data is escaping the VPN tunnel.
  • Respects your privacy: The fact is that many VPN providers don’t respect your privacy. This is most evident with VPNs that keep extensive logs of users. These logs can contain valuable data which is then sold to third parties. I read each VPN’s privacy policy to make sure there’s no identifying logs. I also prioritize VPNs that have had their no-logs policies independently audited.

How to Use the Best VPN: A Step-by-Step Guide

Getting set up and connected to your shiny new VPN couldn’t be easier. Simply follow the steps below to secure your internet connection and circumvent geo-blocking and censorship:

  1. Sign up with the best VPN service that you feel best fits your needs. Proton VPN is our top pick.
  2. Download and install the VPN on your devices. I’ve only recommended VPN services that allow at least seven simultaneous connections per account.
  3. Open the VPN app and log in if prompted. You can then connect to a server in your preferred location. For example, a server in the U.S. if you want a U.S. IP address.
  4. Your connection is now secure. You can now browse more privately because your real IP address has been hidden and your traffic is encrypted.
  5. If you’re having trouble unblocking, clear your browser’s cache and cookies. This helps websites and services forget your previous IP address and location.

VPN FAQs

Are VPNs legal to use?

Yes, VPNs are legal to use in almost every country worldwide. There are a small number of exceptions such as China and Russia. Even then, VPNs aren’t outright illegal but their use is restricted or otherwise regulated. To stay safe, be sure to check local laws before using one.

Will a VPN slow my internet speed?

A VPN encrypts and redirects your traffic to one of its servers in another location. This in itself can slow your internet speed slightly. Yet the best VPNs use fast protocols and don’t throttle your bandwidth. This means that you shouldn’t notice a difference even when streaming.

Can I use a VPN to access Netflix?

Netflix actively blocks VPNs in an effort to protect copyright and licensing agreements by preventing users from accessing content outside their region. Yet some VPNs are capable of bypassing Netflix’s VPN blocking, several of which are included among our best VPN list.

Why not just use a free VPN instead?

The majority of free VPNs offer very few servers and locations. They also tend to cap the data and speed of users. This makes free VPNs unsuitable for anything other than very basic browsing. There’s also the risk that they’ll look to profit by logging and selling your data.

Mark Gill is a freelance VPN writer for IGN, bringing years of dedicated experience from Comparitech, where he delves deep into the intricacies of VPNs. When he’s not testing VPNs, Mark is an avid gamer with a soft spot for the Sega Mega Drive, reliving the classics for a dose of nostalgia.

  •  

The Most Recently Retired LEGO Star Wars Set Is Still Available at Amazon

The LEGO Star Wars Spider Tank set (75361) is still available on Amazon despite being officially retired recently in May. For $49.99 you can still pick up this set depicting an action-packed scene from the Mandalorian season 3. The spider tank itself is a to-scale cyborg that towers over the included minifigures just like in the show. At 526 pieces, it's a great gift for any LEGO and Star Wars fan or for collectors looking to fill in any blanks.

For more awesome LEGO Star Wars sets, check out the best sets to build in 2025.

Retired LEGO Star Wars Spider Tank Is Still Available at Amazon

The Spider Tank is highly detailed, offering an almost one-to-one replica from the Mandalorian. Its front claws and mandibles move, its legs are easily flexible, and it comes equipped with a back-mounted cannon that actually launches LEGO studs. The set also includes three minifigures: The Mandalorian Din Djarin (with the Darksaber!), Bo-Katan Kryze, and Grogu for you to recreate the fight against the tank. This set was officially retired in May, so supplies are likely limited and the price will probably go up eventually.

The Mandalorian is a live-action Star Wars series exclusively streaming on Disney+ starring Pedro Pascal. We gave season 3 a seven overall, saying in our review that it "continues to deliver plenty of great action but spent too much time tying into other shows and juggling between competing protagonists". The next chapter in the Mandalorian saga is the upcoming Mandalorian & Grogu film directed by Jon Favreau, coming May 2026.

More Recently Retired LEGO Sets on Amazon

Once LEGO officially retires a set, they tend to hang around at other retailers for a bit longer. This makes Amazon one of the best places to buy LEGO thanks to their extended inventory of these products. There are a number of other recently retired sets you can currently still purchases right now. We've featured some of the most popular ones below:

Myles Obenza is a freelance writer for IGN. Follow him on Bluesky @mylesobenza.bsky.social.

  •  

Save 50% Off These Fun Official LEGO Trifold Wallets

You're never too old to bring out the kid inside you. For a limited time, Amazon is offering 50% off select styles of officially licensed LEGO trifold wallets. They're normally $15 each, but a bunch of them are on sale right now for $7.49 on Amazon. Get free shipping on orders over $35, or no minimum with an Amazon Prime membership.

50% Off LEGO Wallets

Choose from several different designs such as the classic LEGO brick wall pattern or iconic minifigs including the Ninjago Team, Unicorn Girl, or Shark Suit Guy. As cute as these wallets are, they're also practically designed. These are trifold-style wallets that can hold plenty of cards as well as your ID, cash, keys, and even coins. They're made from double-stitched RPET fabric made to survive the wear and tear, even from more youthfully exuberant individuals.

For more LEGO news and deals, check out the recently retired LEGO sets of May, the best LEGO Star Wars sets to build, a LEGO Mario Kart set geared towards adults, and our recent LEGO River Steamboat in-house build. Don't forget to check out the upcoming LEGO The Simpons Krusty Burger, which is set to be released in early June.

Eric Song is the IGN commerce manager in charge of finding the best gaming and tech deals every day. When Eric isn't hunting for deals for other people at work, he's hunting for deals for himself during his free time.

  •  

The Best Sports Headphone Under $50: The Baseus Bowie MC1 Open Ear Clip-On Earbuds Drops to $39.99

We just found a great deal for anyone looking for an inexpensive pair of earbuds that are a perfect fit (pun intended) for sports, exercise, or fitness activities. Right now Amazon is offering the Baseus Bowie MC1 Open Ear Clip-On Earbuds for just $39.99 with free shipping after you clip a $20 off coupon on the product page and apply a $10 off coupon code "P2XMEPBB" during checkout. That's a 44% price drop from its original $70 list price.

Baseus Bowie MC1 Open Ear Sports Earbuds for $39.99

The Baseus Bowie utilizes a unique hook-ear shape that keeps the earbuds securely in place even when you're moving around. It sits right above instead of inside your ear canal. This open-ear design allows you to hear your immediate surroundings, which is ideal if you're running or biking on streets, listening to an instructor, or carrying a conversation while working out. The earbuds are IP57 rated for water and dust protection and there are on-button controls, although you can also use the mobile app if you don't want to fiddle around with the buds once they're on your ear.

My favorite sport earbuds are the Shokz OpenRuns, but they retail for $120 or 300% more than these Bowie MC1. Another popular "budget" earbuds are the AirPods 4. However, they're not specifically designed to be used during active workouts, they're only ideal for iPhone users, and they're also three times more expensive than the Bowies. At its current price point, it's hard to find anything that can compete. You can check out our 2025 picks for the best running headphones and earbuds but be forewarned that they are all also much pricier than the Bowies.

Eric Song is the IGN commerce manager in charge of finding the best gaming and tech deals every day. When Eric isn't hunting for deals for other people at work, he's hunting for deals for himself during his free time.

  •