More molecules and compounds vital to the origin of life have been detected in asteroid samples delivered to Earth by NASA’s OSIRIS-REx mission. The discovery strengthens the case that not only did life’s building blocks originate in space, but that the ingredients of RNA, and perhaps RNA itself, were brought to our planet by asteroids.
Two new papers in Nature Geoscience and Nature Astronomy describe the discovery of the sugars ribose and glucose in the 120 g of samples returned from the near-Earth asteroid 101955 Bennu, as well as an unusual carbonaceous “gum” that holds important compounds for life. The findings complement the earlier discovery of amino acids and the nucleobases of RNA and DNA in the Bennu samples.
A third new paper, in Nature Astronomy, addresses the abundance of pre-solar grains, which is dust that originated from before the birth of our Solar System, such as dust from supernovae. Scientists led by Ann Nguyen of NASA’s Johnson Space Center found six times more dust direct from supernova explosions than is found, on average, in meteorites and other sampled asteroids. This could suggest differences in the concentration of different pre-solar dust grains in the disc of gas and dust that formed the Solar System.
It’s the discovery of organic materials useful for life that steals the headlines, though. For example, the discovery of the space gum, which is essentially a hodgepodge chain of polymers, represents something never found in space before.
Scott Sandford of NASA’s Ames Research Center, co-lead author of the Nature Astronomy paper describing the gum discovery, tells Physics World: “The material we see in our samples is a bit of a molecular jumble. It’s carbonaceous, but much richer in nitrogen and, to a lesser extent, oxygen, than most of the organic compounds found in extraterrestrial materials.”
Sandford refers to the material as gum because of its pliability, bending and dimpling when pressure is applied, rather like chewing gum. And while much of its chemical functionality is replicated in similar materials on our planet, “I doubt it matches exactly with anything seen on Earth,” he says.
Initially, Sandford found the gum using an infrared microscope, nicknaming the dust grains containing the gum “Lasagna” and “Neapolitan” because the grains are layered. To extract them from the rock in the sample, Sandford went to Zack Gainsforth of the University of California, Berkeley, who specializes in analysing and extracting materials from samples like this.
Having welded a tungsten needle to the Neapolitan sample in order to lift it, the pair quickly realised that the grain was very delicate.
“When we tried to lift the sample it began to deform,” Gainsforth says. “Scott and I practically jumped out of our chairs and brainstormed what to do. After some discussion, we decided that we should add straps to give it enough mechanical rigidity to survive the lift.”
By straps, Gainsforth is referring to micro-scale platinum scaffolding applied to the grain to reinforce its structure while they cut it away with an ion beam. Platinum is often used as a radiation shield to protect samples from an ion beam, “but how we used it was anything but standard,” says Gainsforth. “Scott and I made an on-the-fly decision to reinforce the samples based on how they were reacting to our machinations.”
With the sample extracted and reinforced, they used the ion beam cutter to shave it down until it was a thousand times thinner than a human hair, at which point it could be studied by electron microscopy and X-ray spectrometry. “It was a joy to watch Zack ‘micro-manipulate’ [the sample],” says Sandford.
The nitrogen in the gum was found to be in nitrogen heterocycles, which are the building blocks of nucleobases in DNA and RNA. This brings us to the other new discovery, reported in Nature Geoscience, of the sugars ribose and glucose in the Bennu samples, by a team led by Yoshihiro Furukawa of Tohoku University in Japan.
Glucose is the primary source of energy for life, while ribose is a key component of the sugar-phosphate backbone that connects the information-carrying nucleobases in RNA molecules. Furthermore, the discovery of ribose now means that everything required to assemble RNA molecules is present in the Bennu sample.
Notable by its absence, however, was deoxyribose, which is ribose minus one oxygen atom. Deoxyribose in DNA performs the same job as ribose in RNA, and Furukawa believes that its absence supports a popular hypothesis about the origin of life on Earth called RNA world. This describes how the first life could have used RNA instead of DNA to carry genetic information, catalyse biochemical reactions and self-replicate.
Intriguingly, the presence of all RNA’s ingredients on Bennu raises the possibility that RNA could have formed in space before being brought to Earth.
“Formation of RNA from its building blocks requires a dehydration reaction, which we can expect to have occurred both in ancient Bennu and on primordial Earth,” Furukawa tells Physics World.
However, RNA would be very hard to detect because of its expected low abundance in the samples, making identifying it very difficult. So until there’s information to the contrary, “the present finding means that the ingredients of RNA were delivered from space to the Earth,” says Furukawa.
Nevertheless, these discoveries are major milestones in the quest of astrobiologists and space chemists to understand the origin of life on Earth. Thanks to Bennu and the asteroid 162173 Ryugu, from which a sample was returned by the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) mission Hayabusa2, scientists are increasingly confident that the building blocks of life on Earth came from space.
The post Components of RNA among life’s building blocks found in NASA asteroid sample appeared first on Physics World.
As a physicist in industry, I spend my days developing new types of photovoltaic (PV) panels. But I’m also keen to do something for the transition to green energy outside work, which is why I recently installed two PV panels on the balcony of my flat in Munich. Fitting them was great fun – and I can now enjoy sunny days even more knowing that each panel is generating electricity.
However, the panels, which each have a peak power of 440 W, don’t cover all my electricity needs, which prompted me to take an interest in a plan to build six wind turbines in a forest near me on the outskirts of Munich. Curious about the project, I particularly wanted to find out when the turbines will start generating electricity for the grid. So when I heard that a weekend cycle tour of the site was being organized to showcase it to local residents, I grabbed my bike and joined in.
As we cycle, I discover that the project – located in Forstenrieder Park – is the joint effort of four local councils and two “citizen-energy” groups, who’ve worked together for the last five years to plan and start building the six turbines. Each tower will be 166 m high and the rotor blades will be 80 m long, with the plan being for them to start operating in 2027.
I’ve never thought of Munich as a particularly windy city, but at the height at which the blades operate, there’s always a steady, reliable flow of wind
I’ve never thought of Munich as a particularly windy city. But tour leader Dieter Maier, who’s a climate adviser to Neuried council, explains that at the height at which the blades operate, there’s always a steady, reliable flow of wind. In fact, each turbine has a designed power output of 6.5 MW and will deliver a total of 10 GWh in energy over the course of a year.
Cycling around, I’m excited to think that a single turbine could end up providing the entire electricity demand for Neuried. But installing wind turbines involves much more than just the technicalities of generating electricity. How do you connect the turbines to the grid? How do you ensure planes don’t fly into the turbines? What about wildlife conservation and biodiversity?
At one point of our tour, we cycle round a 90-degree bend in the forest and I wonder how a huge, 80 m-long blade will be transported round that kind of tight angle? Trees will almost certainly have to be felled to get the blade in place, which sounds questionable for a supposedly green project. Fortunately, project leaders have been working with the local forest manager and conservationists, finding ways to help improve the local biodiversity despite the loss of trees.
As a representative of BUND (one of Germany’s biggest conservation charities) explains on the tour, a natural, or “unmanaged”, forest consists of a mix of areas with a higher or lower density of trees. But Forstenrieder Park has been a managed forest for well over a century and is mostly thick with trees. Clearing trees for the turbines will therefore allow conservationists to grow more of the bushes and plants that currently struggle to find space to flourish.
To avoid endangering birds and bats native to this forest, meanwhile, the turbines will be turned off when the animals are most active, which coincidentally corresponds to low wind periods in Munich. Insurance costs have to be factored in too. Thankfully, it’s quite unlikely that a turbine will burn down or get ice all over its blades, which means liability insurance costs are low. But vandalism is an ever-present worry.
In fact, at the end of our bike tour, we’re taken to a local wind turbine that is already up and running about 13 km further south of Forstenrieder Park. This turbine, I’m disappointed to discover, was vandalized back in 2024, which led to it being fenced off and video surveillance cameras being installed.
But for all the difficulties, I’m excited by the prospect of the wind turbines supporting the local energy needs. I can’t wait for the day when I’m on my balcony, solar panels at my side, sipping a cup of tea made with water boiled by electricity generated by the rotor blades I can see turning round and round on the horizon.
The post So you want to install a wind turbine? Here’s what you need to know appeared first on Physics World.
Whether you’re running a business project, carrying out scientific research, or doing a spot of DIY around the house, knowing when something is “good enough” can be a tough question to answer. To me, “good enough” means something that is fit for purpose. It’s about striking a balance between the effort required to achieve perfection and the cost of not moving forward. It’s an essential mindset when perfection is either not needed or – as is often the case – not attainable.
When striving for good enough, the important thing to focus on is that your outcome should meet expectations, but not massively exceed them. Sounds simple, but how often have we heard people say things like they’re “polishing coal”, striving for “gold plated” or “trying to make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear”. It basically means they haven’t understood, defined or even accepted the requirements of the end goal.
Trouble is, as we go through school, college and university, we’re brought up to believe that we should strive for the best in whatever we study. Those with the highest grades, we’re told, will probably get the best opportunities and career openings. Unfortunately, this approach means we think we need to aim for perfection in everything in life, which is not always a good thing.
So why is aiming for “good enough” a good thing to do? First, there’s the notion of “diminishing returns”. It takes a disproportionate amount of effort to achieve the final, small improvements that most people won’t even notice. Put simply, time can be wasted on unnecessary refinements, as embodied by the 80/20 rule (see box).
Also known as the Pareto principle – in honour of the Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto who first came up with the idea – the 80/20 rule states that for many outcomes, 80% of consequences or results come from 20% of the causes or effort. The principle helps to identify where to prioritize activities to boost productivity and get better results. It is a guideline, and the ratios can vary, but it can be applied to many things in both our professional and personal lives.
Examples from the world of business include the following:
Business sales: 80% of a company’s revenue might come from 20% of its customers.
Company productivity: 80% of your results may come from 20% of your daily tasks.
Software development: 80% of bugs could be caused by 20% of the code.
Quality control: 20% of defects may cause 80% of customer complaints.
Good enough also helps us to focus efforts. When a consumer or customer doesn’t know exactly what they want, or a product development route is uncertain, it can be better to deliver things in small chunks. Providing something basic but usable can be used to solicit feedback to help clarify requirements or make improvements or additions that can be incorporated into the next chunk. This is broadly along the lines of a “minimum viable product”.
Not seeking perfection reminds us too that solutions to problems are often uncertain. If it’s not clear how, or even if, something might work, a proof of concept (PoC) can instead be a good way to try something out. Progress can be made by solving a specific technical challenge, whether via a basic experiment, demonstration or short piece of research. A PoC should help avoid committing significant time and resource to something that will never work.
Aiming for “good enough” naturally leads us to the notion of “continuous improvement”. It’s a personal favourite of mine because it allows for things to be improved incrementally as we learn or get feedback, rather than producing something in one go and then forgetting about it. It helps keep things current and relevant and encourages a culture of constantly looking for a better way to do things.
Finally, when searching for good enough, don’t forget the idea of ballpark estimates. Making approximations sounds too simple to be effective, but sometimes a rough estimate is really all you need. If an approximate guess can inform and guide your next steps or determine whether further action will be necessary then go for it.
Being good enough doesn’t just lead to practical outcomes, it can benefit our personal well-being too. Our time, after all, is a precious commodity and we can’t magically increase this resource. The pursuit of perfection can lead to stagnation, and ultimately burnout, whereas achieving good enough allows us to move on in a timely fashion.
A good-enough approach will even make you less stressed. By getting things done sooner and achieving more, you’ll feel freer and happier about your work even if it means accepting imperfection. Mistakes and errors are inevitable in life, so don’t be afraid to make them; use them as learning opportunities, rather than seeing them as something bad. Remember – the person who never made a mistake never got out of bed.
Recognizing that you’ve done the best you can for now is also crucial for starting new projects and making progress. By accepting good enough you can build momentum, get more things done, and consistently take actions toward achieving your goals.
Finally, good enough is also about shared ownership. By inviting someone else to look at what you’ve done, you can significantly speed up the process. In my own career I’ve often found myself agonising over some obscure detail or feeling something is missing, only to have my quandary solved almost instantly simply by getting someone else involved – making me wish I’d asked them sooner.
Good enough comes with some caveats. Regulatory or legislative requirements means there will always be projects that have to reach a minimum standard, which will be your top priority. The precise nature of good enough will also depend on whether you’re making stuff (be it cars or computers) or dealing with intangible commodities such as software or services.
So what’s the conclusion? Well, in the interests of my own time, I’ve decided to apply the 80/20 rule and leave it to you to draw your own conclusion. As far as I’m concerned, I think this article has been good enough, but I’m sure you’ll let me know if it hasn’t. Consider it as a minimally viable product that I can update in a future column.
The post When is good enough ‘good enough’? appeared first on Physics World.
UK artist Alison Stott has created a new glass and light artwork – entitled Naturally Focused – that is inspired by the work of theoretical physicist Michael Berry from the University of Bristol.
Stott, who recently competed an MA in glass at Arts University Plymouth, spent over two decades previously working in visual effects for film and television, where she focussed on creating photorealistic imagery.
Her studies touched on how complex phenomena can arise from seemingly simple set-ups, for example in a rotating glass sculpture lit by LEDs.
“My practice inhabits the spaces between art and science, glass and light, craft and experience,” notes Stott. “Working with molten glass lets me embrace chaos, indeterminacy, and materiality, and my work with caustics explores the co-creation of light, matter, and perception.”
The new artwork is based on “caustics” – the curved patterns that form when light is reflected or refracted by curved surfaces or objects
The focal point of the artwork is a hand-blown glass lens that was waterjet-cut into a circle and polished so that its internal structure and optical behaviour are clearly visible. The lens is suspended within stainless steel gyroscopic rings and held by a brass support and stainless stell backplate.
The rings can be tilted or rotated to “activate shifting field of caustic projections that ripple across” the artwork. Mathematical equations are also engraved onto the brass that describe the “singularities of light” that are visible on the glass surface.
The work is inspired by Berry’s research into the relationship between classical and quantum behaviour and how subtle geometric structures govern how waves and particles behave.
Berry recently won the 2025 Isaac Newton Medal and Prize, which is presented by the Institute of Physics, for his “profound contributions across mathematical and theoretical physics in a career spanning over 60 years”.
Stott says that working with Berry has pushed her understanding of caustics. “The more I learn about how these structures emerge and why they matter across physics, the more compelling they become,” notes Stott. “My aim is to let the phenomena speak for themselves, creating conditions where people can directly encounter physical behaviour and perhaps feel the same awe and wonder I do.”
The artwork will go on display at the University of Bristol following a ceremony to be held on 27 November.
The post ‘Caustic’ light patterns inspire new glass artwork appeared first on Physics World.
WiFi networks could pose significant privacy risks even to people who aren’t carrying or using WiFi-enabled devices, say researchers at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) in Germany. According to their analysis, the current version of the technology passively records information that is detailed enough to identify individuals moving through networks, prompting them to call for protective measures in the next iteration of WiFi standards.
Although wireless networks are ubiquitous and highly useful, they come with certain privacy and security risks. One such risk stems from a phenomenon known as WiFi sensing, which the researchers at KIT’s Institute of Information Security and Dependability (KASTEL) define as “the inference of information about the networks’ environment from its signal propagation characteristics”.
“As signals propagate through matter, they interfere with it – they are either transmitted, reflected, absorbed, polarized, diffracted, scattered, or refracted,” they write in their study, which is published in the Proceedings of the 2025 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS ’25). “By comparing an expected signal with a received signal, the interference can be estimated and used for error correction of the received data.”
An under-appreciated consequence, they continue, is that this estimation contains information about any humans who may have unwittingly been in the signal’s path. By carefully analysing the signal’s interference with the environment, they say, “certain aspects of the environment can be inferred” – including whether humans are present, what they are doing and even who they are.
The KASTEL team terms this an “identity inference attack” and describes it as a threat that is as widespread as it is serious. “This technology turns every router into a potential means for surveillance,” says Julian Todt, who co-led the study with his KIT colleague Thorsten Strufe. “For example, if you regularly pass by a café that operates a WiFi network, you could be identified there without noticing it and be recognized later – for example by public authorities or companies.”
While Todt acknowledges that security services, cybercriminals and others do have much simpler ways of tracking individuals – for example by accessing data from CCTV cameras or video doorbells – he argues that the ubiquity of wireless networks lends itself to being co-opted as a near-permanent surveillance infrastructure. There is, he adds, “one concerning property” about wireless networks: “They are invisible and raise no suspicion.”
Although the possibility of using WiFi networks in this way is not new, most previous WiFi-based security attacks worked by analysing so-called channel state information (CSI). These data indicate how a radio signal changes when it reflects off walls, furniture, people or animals. However, the KASTEL researchers note that the latest WiFi standard, known as WiFi 5 (802.11ac), changes the picture by enabling a new and potentially easier form of attack based on beamforming feedback information (BFI).
While beamforming uses similar information as CSI, Todt explains that it does so on the sender’s side instead of the receiver’s. This means that a BFI-based surveillance method would require nothing more than standard devices connected to the WiFi network. “The BFI could be used to create images from different perspectives that might then serve to identify persons that find themselves in the WiFi signal range,” Todt says. “The identity of individuals passing through these radio waves could then be extracted using a machine-learning model. Once trained, this model would make an identification in just a few seconds.”
In their experiments, Todt and colleagues studied 197 participants as they walked through a WiFi field while being simultaneously recorded with CSI and BFI from four different angles. The participants had five different “walking styles” (such as walking normally and while carrying a backpack) as well as different gaits. The researchers found that they could identify individuals with nearly 100% accuracy, regardless of the recording angle or the individual’s walking style or gait.
“The technology is powerful, but at the same time entails risks to our fundamental rights, especially to privacy,” says Strufe. He warns that authoritarian states could use the technology to track demonstrators and members of opposition groups, prompting him and his colleagues to “urgently call” for protective measures and privacy safeguards to be included in the forthcoming IEEE 802.11bf WiFi standard.
“The literature on all novel sensing solutions highlights their utility for various novel applications,” says Todt, “but the privacy risks that are inherent to such sensing are often overlooked, or worse — these sensors are claimed to be privacy-friendly without any rationale for these claims. As such, we feel it necessary to point out the privacy risks that novel solutions such as WiFi sensing bring with them.”
The researchers say they would like to see approaches developed that can mitigate the risk of identity inference attack. However, they are aware that this will be difficult, since this type of attack exploits the physical properties of the actual WiFi signal. “Ideally, we would influence the WiFi standard to contain privacy-protections in future versions,” says Todt, “but even the impact of this would be limited as there are already millions of WiFi devices out there that are vulnerable to such an attack.”
The post Is your WiFi spying on you? appeared first on Physics World.
Physics Around the Clock: Adventures in the Science of Everyday Living
By Michael Banks
Why do Cheerios tend to stick together while floating in a bowl of milk? Why does a runner’s ponytail swing side to side? These might not be the most pressing questions in physics, but getting to the answers is both fun and provides insights into important scientific concepts. These are just two examples of everyday physics that Physics World news editor Michael Banks explores in his book Physics Around the Clock, which begins with the physics (and chemistry) of your morning coffee and ends with a formula for predicting the winner of those cookery competitions that are mainstays of evening television. Hamish Johnston
Quantum 2.0: the Past, Present and Future of Quantum Physics
By Paul Davies
You might wonder why the world needs yet another book about quantum mechanics, but for physicists there’s no better guide than Paul Davies. Based for the last two decades at Arizona State University in the US, in Quantum 2.0 Davies tackles the basics of quantum physics – along with its mysteries, applications and philosophical implications – with great clarity and insight. The book ends with truly strange topics such as quantum Cheshire cats and delayed-choice quantum erasers – see if you prefer his descriptions to those we’ve attempted in Physics World this year. Matin Durrani
Can You Get Music on the Moon? the Amazing Science of Sound and Space
By Sheila Kanani, illustrated by Liz Kay
Why do dogs bark but wolves howl? How do stars “sing”? Why does thunder rumble? This delightful, fact-filled children’s book answers these questions and many more, taking readers on an adventure through sound and space. Written by planetary scientist Sheila Kanani and illustrated by Liz Kay, Can you get Music on the Moon? reveals not only how sound is produced but why it can make us feel certain things. Each of the 100 or so pages brims with charming illustrations that illuminate the many ways that sound is all around us. Michael Banks
A Short History of Nearly Everything 2.0
By Bill Bryson
Alongside books such as Stephen Hawking’s A Brief History of Time and Carl Sagan’s Cosmos, British-American author Bill Bryson’s A Short History of Nearly Everything is one of the bestselling popular-science books of the last 50 years. First published in 2003, the book became a fan favourite of readers across the world and across disciplines as Bryson wove together a clear and humorous narrative of our universe. Now, 22 years later, he has released an updated and revised volume – A Short History of Nearly Everything 2.0 – that covers major updates in science from the past two decades. This includes the discovery of the Higgs boson and the latest on dark-matter research. The new edition is still imbued with all the wit and wisdom of the original, making it the perfect Christmas present for scientists and anyone else curious about the world around us. Tushna Commissariat
The post Breakfast physics, delving into quantum 2.0, the science of sound, an update to everything: micro reviews of recent books appeared first on Physics World.
It is book week here at Physics World and over the course of three days we are presenting conversations with the authors of three fascinating and fun books about physics. First up is my Physics World colleague Michael Banks, whose book Physics Around the Clock: Adventures in the Science of Everyday Living starts with your morning coffee and ends with a formula for making your evening television viewing more satisfying.
As well as the rich physics of coffee, we chat about strategies for finding the best parking spot and the efficient boarding of aeroplanes. If you have ever wondered why a runner’s ponytail swings from side-to-side when they reach a certain speed – we have the answer for you.
Other daily mysteries that we explore include how a hard steel razor blade can be dulled by cutting relatively soft hairs and why quasiparticles called “jamitons” are helping physicists understand the spontaneous appearance of traffic jams. And a warning for squeamish listeners, we do talk about the amazing virus-spreading capabilities of a flushing toilet.
This episode is supported by the APS Global Physics Summit, which takes place on 15–20 March, 2026, in Denver, Colorado, and online.
The post Better coffee, easier parking and more: the fascinating physics of daily life appeared first on Physics World.
When a star rapidly accumulates gas and dust during its early growth phase, it’s called an accretion burst. Now, for the first time, astronomers have observed a planet doing the same thing. The discovery, made using the European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope (VLT) and the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), shows that the infancy of certain planetary-mass objects and that of newborn stars may share similar characteristics.
In their study, which is detailed in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, astronomers led by Víctor Almendros-Abad at Italy’s Palermo Astronomical Observatory; Ray Jayawardhana of Johns Hopkins University in the US; and Belinda Damian and Aleks Scholz of the University of St Andrews, UK, focused on a planet known as Cha1107-7626. Located around 620 light-years from Earth, this planet has a mass approximately five to 10 times that of Jupiter. Unlike Jupiter, though, it does not orbit around a central star. Instead, it floats freely in space as a “rogue” planet, one of many identified in recent years.
Like other rogue planets, Cha1107-7626 was known to be surrounded by a disk of dust and gas. When material from this disk spirals, or accretes, onto the planet, the planet grows.
What Almendros-Abad and colleagues discovered is that this process is not uniform. Using the VLT’s XSHOOTER and the NIRSpec and MIRI instruments on JWST, they found that Cha1107-7626 experienced a burst of accretion beginning in June 2025. This is the first time anyone has seen an accretion burst in an object with such a low mass, and the peak accretion rate of six billion tonnes per second makes it the strongest accretion episode ever recorded in a planetary-mass object. It may not be over, either. At the end of August, when the observing campaign ended, the burst was still ongoing.
The team identified several parallels between Cha1107-7626’s accretion burst and those that young stars experience. Among them were clear signs that gas is being funnelled onto the planet. “This indicates that magnetic fields structure the flow of gas, which is again something well known from stars,” explains Scholz. “Overall, our discovery is establishing interesting, perhaps surprising parallels between stars and planets, which I’m not sure we fully understand yet.”
The astronomers also found that the chemistry of the disc around the planet changed during accretion, with water being present in this phase even though it hadn’t been before. This effect has previously been spotted in stars, but never in a planet until now.
“We’re struck by quite how much the infancy of free-floating planetary-mass objects resembles that of stars like the Sun,” Jayawardhana says. “Our new findings underscore that similarity and imply that some objects comparable to giant planets form the way stars do, from contracting clouds of gas and dust accompanied by disks of their own, and they go through growth episodes just like newborn stars.”
The researchers have been studying similar objects for many years and earlier this year published results based on JWST observations that featured a small sample of planetary-mass objects. “This particular study is part of that sample,” Scholz tells Physics World, “and we obtained the present results because Victor wanted to look in detail at the accretion flow onto Cha1107-7626, and in the process discovered the burst.”
The researchers say they are “keeping an eye” on Cha1107-7626 and other such objects that are still growing because their environment is dynamic and unstable. “More to the point, we really don’t understand what drives these accretion events, and we need detailed follow-up to figure out the underlying reasons for these processes,” Scholz says.
The post Young rogue planet grows like a star appeared first on Physics World.
Earlier this year I met the Massachusetts-based steampunk artist Bruce Rosenbaum at the Global Physics Summit of the American Physical Society. He was exhibiting a beautiful sculpture of a “quantum engine” that was created in collaboration with physicists including NIST’s Nicole Yunger Halpern – who pioneered the scientific field of quantum steampunk.
I was so taken by the art and science of quantum steampunk that I promised Rosenbaum that I would chat with him and Yunger Halpern on the podcast – and here is that conversation. We begin by exploring the art of steampunk and how it is influenced by the technology of the 19th century. Then, we look at the physics of quantum steampunk, a field that weds modern concepts of quantum information with thermodynamics – which itself is a scientific triumph of the 19th century.
This podcast is supported by Atlas Technologies, specialists in custom aluminium and titanium vacuum chambers as well as bonded bimetal flanges and fittings used everywhere from physics labs to semiconductor fabs.
The post Quantum steampunk: we explore the art and science appeared first on Physics World.
Connexion