Are the German people on board with the government’s massive militarisation programme? Kate Connolly reports
“Not so long ago, to be a German soldier dressed in German uniform was quite a difficult role to embody. I mean, you could be going down the street and you could be spat on, or you could have names called at you.
“I’ve recently seen people get into conversation with soldiers, which I hadn’t seen in the past, [and] more recently, somebody going up to a soldier and actually getting him into conversation about his role, and at the end of the conversation, thanking him.”
Why do some people age better than others? Five extraordinary individuals – who scientists are studying – share their tips
Lajuana Weathers is determined to be the healthiest version of herself. She starts each day with a celery juice, is always trying to increase her step count, and meditates daily. Weathers is also 89 years old. And she has no plans to slow down. “I wake up in the morning and feel blessed that I have another chance at a day of life,” says the grandmother of six, and great‑grandmother of six more, who lives in Illinois in an independent living facility for seniors. “I look at my life as a holistic entity, and in that life is my physical, social, emotional and spiritual wellbeing. I have to take care of all of those. That’s what I like about the ageing process. All the clutter of raising children is out and I can concentrate on the wellness of me.”
Weathers is a superager. This isn’t a self-proclaimed label, but one backed up by science – she is part of the SuperAging Research Initiative at the University of Chicago. To qualify for the study, you have to be over 80 years old and have memory performance that’s at least as good as the average 50- to 60-year-old. There are about 400 superagers enrolled across North America.
L’affaire Epstein continue de hanter l’ancien prince Andrew. Déchu de ses titres royaux, il doit désormais quitter son manoir de Windsor pour s’installer dans le nord de l’Angleterre. Cette nouvelle demeure, en proie...
L’affaire Epstein continue de hanter l’ancien prince Andrew. Déchu de ses titres royaux, il doit désormais quitter son manoir de Windsor pour s’installer dans le nord de l’Angleterre. Cette nouvelle demeure, en proie...
Particle pioneer: One of Holtkamp’s main aims will be to oversee the completion of the $1.5bn Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility-Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (courtesy: JJ Starr, Fermilab)
With a PhD in physics from the Technical University in Darmstadt, Germany, Holtkamp has managed large scientific projects throughout his career.
Holtkamp is the former deputy director of the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory at Stanford University where he managedthe construction of the Linac Coherent Light Source upgrade, the world’s most powerful X-ray laser, along with more than $2bn of onsite construction projects.
Holtkamp also previously served as the principal deputy director general for the international fusion project ITER, which is currently under construction in Cadarache, France.
Holtkamp worked at Fermilab between 1998 and 2001, where he worked on commissioning the Main Injector and also led a study on the feasibility of an intense neutrino source based on a muon storage ring.
LBNF-DUNE will study the properties of neutrinos in unprecedented detail, as well as the differences in behaviour between neutrinos and antineutrinos. The DUNE detector, which lies about 1300 km from Fermilab, will measure the neutrinos that are generated by Fermilab’s accelerator complex, which is just outside Chicago.
In a statement, Holtkamp said he is “deeply honoured” to lead the lab. “Fermilab has done so much to advance our collective understanding of the fundamentals of our universe,” he says. “I am committed to ensuring the laboratory remains the neutrino capital of the world, and the safe and successful completion of LBNF-DUNE is key to that goal. I’m excited to rejoin Fermilab at this pivotal moment to guide this project and our other important modernization efforts to prepare the lab for a bright future.”
Then in October that year, a new organization – Fermi Forward Discovery Group – was announced to manage the lab for the US Department of Energy. That move came under scrutiny given it is dominated by the University of Chicago and Universities Research Association (URA), a consortium of research universities, which had already been part of the management since 2007. Then a month later, almost 2.5% of Fermilab’s employees were laid off.
“We’re excited to welcome Norbert, who brings of a wealth of scientific and managerial experience to Fermilab,” noted University of Chicago president Paul Alivisatos, who is also chair of the board of directors of Fermi Forward Discovery Group.
Alivisatos thanked Kim for her “tireless service” as director. “[Kim] played a critical role in strengthening relationships with Fermilab’s leading stakeholders, driving the lab’s modernization efforts, and positioning Fermilab to amplify DOE’s broader goals in areas like quantum science and AI,” added Alivisatos.
Popularity isn’t everything. But it is something, so for the second year running, we’re finishing our trip around the Sun by looking back at the physics stories that got the most attention over the past 12 months. Here, in ascending order of popularity, are the 10 most-read stories published on the Physics World website in 2025.
We’ve had quantum science on our minds all year long, courtesy of 2025 being UNESCO’s International Year of Quantum Science and Technology. But according to theoretical work by Partha Ghose and Dimitris Pinotsis, it’s possible that the internal workings of our brains could also literally be driven by quantum processes.
Though neurons are generally regarded as too big to display quantum effects, Ghose and Pinotsis established that the equations describing the classical physics of brain responses are mathematically equivalent to the equations describing quantum mechanics. They also derived a Schrödinger-like equation specifically for neurons. So if you’re struggling to wrap your head around complex quantum concepts, take heart: it’s possible that your brain is ahead of you.
Testing times A toy model from Marco Pettini seeks to reconcile quantum entanglement with Einstein’s theory of relativity. (Courtesy: Shutterstock/Eugene Ivanov)
Einstein famously disliked the idea of quantum entanglement, dismissing its effects as “spooky action at a distance”. But would he have liked the idea of an extra time dimension any better? We’re not sure he would, but that is the solution proposed by theoretical physicist Marco Pettini, who suggests that wavefunction collapse could propagate through a second time dimension. Pettini got the idea from discussions with the Nobel laureate Roger Penrose and from reading old papers by David Bohm, but not everyone is impressed by these distinguished intellectual antecedents. In this article, Bohm’s former student and frequent collaborator Jeffrey Bub went on the record to say he “wouldn’t put any money on” Pettini’s theory being correct. Ouch.
Continuing the theme of intriguing, blue-sky theoretical research, the eighth-most-read article of 2025 describes how two theoretical physicists, Kaden Hazzard and Zhiyuan Wang, proposed a new class of quasiparticles called paraparticles. Based on their calculations, these paraparticles exhibit quantum properties that are fundamentally different from those of bosons and fermions. Notably, paraparticles strikes a balance between the exclusivity of fermions and the clustering tendency of bosons, with up to two paraparticles allowed to occupy the same quantum state (rather than zero for fermions or infinitely many for bosons). But do they really exist? No-one knows yet, but Hazzard and Wang say that experimental studies of ultracold atoms could hold the answer.
Capturing colour A still life taken by Lippmann using his method sometime between 1890 and 1910. By the latter part of this period, the method had fallen out of favour, superseded by the simpler Autochrome process. (Courtesy: Photo in public domain)
The list of early Nobel laureates in physics is full of famous names – Roentgen, Curie, Becquerel, Rayleigh and so on. But if you go down the list a little further, you’ll find that the 1908 prize went to a now mostly forgotten physicist by the name of Gabriel Lippmann, for a version of colour photography that almost nobody uses (though it’s rather beautiful, as the photo shows). This article tells the story of how and why this happened. A companion piece on the similarly obscure 1912 laureate, Gustaf Dalén, fell just outside this year’s top 10; if you’re a member of the Institute of Physics, you can read both of them together in the November issue of Physics World.
Why should physicists have all the fun of learning about the quantum world? This episode of the Physics World Weekly podcast focuses on the outreach work of Aleks Kissinger and Bob Coecke, who developed a picture-driven way of teaching quantum physics to a group of 15-17-year-old students. One of the students in the original pilot programme, Arjan Dhawan, is now studying mathematics at the University of Durham, and he joined his former mentors on the podcast to answer the crucial question: did it work?
Conflicting views Stalwart physicists Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr had opposing views on quantum fundamentals from early on, which turned into a lifelong scientific argument between the two. (Paul Ehrenfest/Wikimedia Commons)
Niels Bohr had many good ideas in his long and distinguished career. But he also had a few that didn’t turn out so well, and this article by science writer Phil Ball focuses on one of them. Known as the Bohr-Kramers-Slater (BKS) theory, it was developed in 1923 with help from two of the assistants/students/acolytes who flocked to Bohr’s institute in Copenhagen. Several notable physicists hated it because it violated both causality and the conservation of energy, and within two years, experiments by Walther Boethe and Hans Geiger proved them right. The twist, though, is that Boethe went on to win a share of the 1954 Nobel Prize for Physics for this work – making Bohr surely one of the only scientists who won himself a Nobel Prize for his good ideas, and someone else a Nobel Prize for a bad one.
Black holes are fascinating objects in their own right. Who doesn’t love the idea of matter-swallowing cosmic maws floating through the universe? For some theoretical physicists, though, they’re also a way of exploring – and even extending – Einstein’s general theory of relativity. This article describes how thinking about black hole collisions inspired Jiaxi Wu, Siddharth Boyeneni and Elias Most to develop a new formulation of general relativity that mirrors the equations that describe electromagnetic interactions. According to this formulation, general relativity behaves the same way as the gravitational described by Isaac Newton more than 300 years ago, with the “gravito-electric” field fading with the inverse square of distance.
“Best of” lists are a real win-win. If you agree with the author’s selections, you go away feeling confirmed in your mutual wisdom. If you disagree, you get to have a good old moan about how foolish the author was for forgetting your favourites or including something you deem unworthy. Either way, it’s a success – as this very popular list of the top 5 Nobel Prizes for Physics awarded since the year 2000 (as chosen by Physics World editor-in-chief Matin Durrani) demonstrates.
We’re back to black holes again for the year’s second-most-read story, which focuses on a possible link between gravity and quantum information theory via the concept of entropy. Such a link could help explain the so-called black hole information paradox – the still-unresolved question of whether information that falls into a black hole is retained in some form or lost as the black hole evaporates via Hawking radiation. Fleshing out this connection could also shed light on quantum information theory itself, and the theorist who’s proposing it, Ginestra Bianconi, says that experimental measurements of the cosmological constant could one day verify or disprove it.
Experiment schematic Two single atoms floating in a vacuum chamber are illuminated by a laser beam and act as the two slits. The interference of the scattered light is recorded with a highly sensitive camera depicted as a screen. Incoherent light appears as background and implies that the photon has acted as a particle passing only through one slit. (Courtesy: Wolfgang Ketterle, Vitaly Fedoseev, Hanzhen Lin, Yu-Kun Lu, Yoo Kyung Lee and Jiahao Lyu)
Back in 2002, readers of Physics World voted Thomas Young’s electron double-slit experiment “the most beautiful experiment in physics”. More than 20 years later, it continues to fascinate the physics community, as this, the most widely read article of any that Physics World published in 2025, shows.
Young’s original experiment demonstrated the wave-like nature of electrons by sending them through a pair of slits and showing that they create an interference pattern on a screen even when they pass through the slits one-by-one. In this modern update, physicists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), US, stripped this back to the barest possible bones.
Using two single atoms as the slits, they inferred the path of photons by measuring subtle changes in the atoms’ properties after photon scattering. Their results matched the predictions of quantum theory: interference fringes when they didn’t observe the photons’ path, and two bright spots when they did.
It’s an elegant result, and the fact that the MIT team performed the experiment specifically to celebrate the International Year of Quantum Science and Technology 2025 makes its popularity with Physics World readers especially gratifying.
So here’s to another year full of elegant experiments and the theories that inspire them. Long may they both continue, and thank you, as always, for taking the time to read about them.
Susumu Noda of Kyoto University has won the 2026 Rank Prize for Optoelectronics for the development of the Photonic Crystal Surface Emitting Laser (PCSEL). For more than 25 years, Noda developed this new form of laser, which has potential applications in high-precision manufacturing as well as in LIDAR technologies.
Following the development of the laser in 1960, in more recent decades optical fibre lasers and semiconductor lasers have become competing technologies.
A semiconductor laser works by pumping an electrical current into a region where an n-doped (excess of electrons) and a p-doped (excess of “holes”) semiconductor material meet, causing electrons and holes to combine and release photons.
Semiconductors have several advantages in terms of their compactness, high “wallplug” efficiency, and ruggedness, but lack in other areas such as having a low brightness and functionality.
This means that conventional semiconductor lasers required external optical and mechanical elements to improve their performance, which results in large and impractical systems.
‘A great honour’
In the late 1990s, Noda began working on a new type of semiconductor laser that could challenge the performance of optical fibre lasers. These so-called PCSELs employ a photonic crystal layer in between the semiconductor layers. Photonic crystals are nanostructured materials in which a periodic variation of the dielectric constant — formed, for example, by a lattice of holes — creates a photonic band-gap.
Noda and his research made a series of breakthrough in the technology such as demonstrating control of polarization and beam shape by tailoring the phonic crystal structure and expansion into blue–violet wavelengths.
The resulting PCSELs emit a high-quality, symmetric beam with narrow divergence and boast high brightness and high functionality while maintaining the benefits of conventional semiconductor lasers. In 2013, 0.2 W PCSELs became available and a few years later Watt-class PCSEL lasers became operational.
Noda says that it is “a great honour and a surprise” to receive the prize. “I am extremely happy to know that more than 25 years of research on photonic-crystal surface-emitting lasers has been recognized in this way,” he adds. “I do hope to continue to further develop the research and its social implementation.”
Susumu Noda received his BSc and then PhD in electronics from Kyoto University in 1982 and 1991, respectively. From 1984 he also worked at Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, before joining Kyoto University in 1988 where he is currently based.
Founded in 1972 by the British industrialist and philanthropist Lord J Arthur Rank, the Rank Prize is awarded biennially in nutrition and optoelectronics. The 2026 Rank Prize for Optoelectronics, which has a cash award of £100 000, will be awarded formally at an event held in June.
Connexion
