AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT Review

We’re a little over four months into this new generation of graphics cards, and while we would usually be waiting more than a year for cards like the Radeon RX 9060 XT, we got this one three months after the flagship, which is a blistering pace. I mean, the RX 7600 XT, the 9060 XT’s direct predecessor, launched in January 2024, more than a year after the Radeon RX 7900 XTX that headlined that generation.
That does mean the 9060 XT is launching a little sooner than it would have in previous years, but it also means it comes less than two years after the card it’s replacing. That’s going to suck if you bought a 7600 XT thinking it was going to be current-gen for a couple years, but if you’ve been on the fence about upgrading, the 9060’s on-average 40% performance uplift over its predecessor rewards your patience a bit.
Unfortunately, like Nvidia did recently with its RTX 5060 Ti, Team Red is launching two versions of the Radeon RX 9060 XT, one with 16GB of VRAM for $349 and one with 8GB for $299. AMD only sent the 16GB model for review, but you should still avoid the 8GB version – games are becoming more dependent on VRAM every day.
Specs and Features
Both versions of the Radeon RX 9060 XT are built on the RDNA 4 graphics architecture, just like the incredible RX 9070 XT. Both versions of the 9060 XT are built on the same AMD GPU, with 32 Compute Units, making for a total of 2,048 Streaming Multiprocessors (SMs). The only major difference between the two cards is the memory budget, with one 16GB model and an 8GB version for $50 less.
This makes the RX 9060 XT a substantial step down from the 9070 XT, which features double the Compute Units, or even the 9070, with its 56 CUs. The Radeon RX 9060 XT does have the same amount of VRAM as these more powerful cards, but on a much smaller 128-bit memory bus. Compared to the 256-bit bus of Team Red’s pricier cards, you get half the memory bandwidth, at 320GB/s.
Compared to its predecessor, though, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT basically takes the same specs of the RX 7600 XT and moves them to a new graphics architecture, along with some faster memory. Both cards have 32 Compute Units with a total of 2,048 SMs and 16GB of VRAM on a 128-bit bus. However, the memory is clocked a bit faster on the new generation, at 20GB/s, compared to 18GB/s on the 7600 XT.

What’s confusing, though, is that AMD essentially has two power budgets listed in the specs it shared with me. There seems to be both a 160W ‘base’ version of the card, and a 180W version, presumably meant for factory-overclocked versions. The card I tested peaked at 182W in my testing suite, so I obviously got the latter. There likely isn’t a major difference between these two cards when it comes to performance, it’s just that clock speeds are obviously going to be higher in a graphics card with a higher power budget. This only accounted for around a 200MHz difference in my testing, which isn’t enough to make a meaningful impact to gaming performance.
Just like the 9070 cards, AMD is not selling its own reference version of the RX 9060 XT, but the Gigabyte RX 9060 XT Gaming OC 16G I was sent had no problem dealing with temperatures. Throughout my testing, the 9060 XT peaked at just 59°C, with a hot spot temperature of 86°C. That’s thanks to this card’s triple-fan design, which leaves plenty of room if you want to try your hand at overclocking this card.
Performance
While the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT can totally play most games at 1440p, it really shines at 1080p, especially if you like to turn on all the spiffy graphics effects in modern games. On average, I found that the 9060 XT was about 41% faster than the RX 7600 XT at 1080p – not bad considering that card is just over a year old. What’s more interesting, though, is how well it compares with the more expensive RTX 5060 Ti.
I don’t have a RTX 5060 for testing yet, so comparing instead to the RTX 5060 Ti, Nvidia’s latest mid-range card was on average about 12% faster than the Radeon RX 9060 XT, despite being 19% more expensive. The performance difference does grow to 14% when I eliminate 1440p and synthetic performance, but you’re still getting a better deal with the AMD card, assuming prices hold up. They probably won’t, of course, but I can’t tell the future.
As with all of our graphics card reviews, all testing was done on the most recent driver, to make sure all data is up to date. That means Nvidia cards were tested on Game Ready Driver 576.52, AMD cards on Adrenalin 25.5.1, and the Intel Arc B580 was tested on Intel Graphics Driver 32.0.101.6874. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT itself was tested on a pre-release driver provided by AMD.
While it doesn’t exactly represent real-world gaming performance, 3DMark is usually the first test I run on a new graphics card, as it shows the potential I’m dealing with. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT got 2,995 points in Speed Way and 3,753 in Steel Nomad. These are both DirectX 12 tests, with and without ray tracing, respectively. And while the 9060 XT did fall behind the RTX 5060 Ti in Speed Way, it essentially broke even with the more expensive Nvidia card in Steel Nomad. The 9060 XT did so well in Steel Nomad, in fact, that it beat its last-generation counterpart by a whopping 60% at a similar price point – something I haven’t seen much of this generation.
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 is generally considered optimized for AMD hardware, so it shouldn’t be too surprising that AMD edges out a win against the RTX 5060 Ti here, even if it’s just a slight lead. Team Red’s latest is about 8% faster than the RTX 5060 Ti in this game at 1080p, averaging 202 fps with FSR 4 and DLSS set to ‘Quality’, respectively.
Cyberpunk 2077 is basically on the opposite side of the spectrum, and in my experience performs better on Nvidia’s GPUs. Even here, though, the Radeon RX 9060 XT managed 80 fps with the ‘Ray Tracing Ultra’ preset at 1080p, with FSR set to Quality. The RTX 5060 Ti was faster, for sure, but only by 10%, averaging 88 fps with the same settings, just with DLSS. This shows how far AMD has come, too, as the RX 7600 XT gets just 46 fps with the same settings – making for a 74% performance jump.
I like to test Metro Exodus: Enhanced Edition without upscaling, simply because the game only supports DLSS. And while I do think upscaling is necessary these days, I’m not going to enable it on Nvidia cards if I can’t apply similar settings on the competing cards. But even in this ray tracing-heavy game with no upscaling, the 9060 XT hits 59 fps at 1080p, which is just 9% short of the 5060 Ti’s 65 fps.
In Red Dead Redemption 2, the Radeon RX 9060 XT averages 105 fps with all the settings cranked, compared to 101 fps from the 5060 Ti and just 73 from the Radeon RX 7600 XT. The difference between Team Red and Green’s latest cards is within the margin of error here, but considering the price difference, that’s still a win in AMD’s favor.
Total War: Warhammer doesn’t support anything in the way of ray tracing or upscaling, so it gives a clear picture of pure rasterization performance, which is especially important if you play older games. In this game, the Radeon RX 9060 XT managed an average of 125 fps, compared to 154 from the 5060 Ti and 91 from the 7600 XT. That’s a 19% lead in favor of Nvidia.
What’s fun about Assassin’s Creed Shadows is that it’s so demanding, which is a far cry from how easy Mirage was to run, especially on AMD hardware. Shadows has become one of the most demanding benchmarks in my entire suite, and the 9060 XT manages just 45 fps on average at 1080p with all the settings maxed out. Nvidia isn’t too far ahead here either, getting just 51 fps at the same settings.
Black Myth Wukong is another incredibly demanding game that has ray tracing baked into it by default. Just like Assassin’s Creed Shadows, the Radeon RX 9060 XT scrapes by with 45 fps, compared to 57 from the 5060 Ti and 31 from the RX 7600 XT.

A Budget Card?
Whenever I talk about any graphics card launching this year, pricing is the elephant in the room. Because AMD is advertising a price of $349, which is totally reasonable for what the RX 9060 XT is. However, there is a very high possibility that the price is going to be much higher when it actually lands on store shelves. I just can’t possibly predict how much the price is going to move when the card actually launches a day after this writing.
It’s entirely possible that AMD is able to produce enough of these cards to keep the price relatively stable over the next few months. Unfortunately, I have no way of accurately predicting this one way or the other.
If the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT stays available for around $349, it’s an incredible graphics card. It’s significantly faster than its last-generation counterpart and manages to stay within grasping distance of the more-expensive RTX 5060 Ti. But if the price rises by a hundred dollars? Well, it becomes a lot harder to recommend, and that’s without the 8GB model further complicating the matter.
My advice? Pay close attention to the store listing and make sure you’re getting what you pay for. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT has the potential to be an awesome mid-range GPU, just don’t pay too much for it.
Jackie Thomas is the Hardware and Buying Guides Editor at IGN and the PC components queen. You can follow her @Jackiecobra