Vue normale
Why electrochemistry lies at the heart of modern technology
This episode of the Physics World Weekly podcast features a conversation with Colm O’Dwyer, who is professor of chemical energy at University College Cork in Ireland and president of the Electrochemical Society.
He talks about the role that electrochemistry plays in the development of modern technologies including batteries, semiconductor chips and pharmaceuticals. O’Dwyer chats about the role that the Electrochemical Society plays in advancing the theory and practice of electrochemistry and solid-state science and technology. He also explains how electrochemists collaborate with scientists and engineers in other fields including physics – and he looks forward to the future of electrochemistry.
This podcast is supported by American Elements. Trusted by researchers and industries the world over, American Elements is helping shape the future of battery and electrochemistry technology.
The post Why electrochemistry lies at the heart of modern technology appeared first on Physics World.
- Physics World
- China’s Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak smashes fusion confinement record
China’s Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak smashes fusion confinement record
A fusion tokamak in China has smashed its previous fusion record of maintaining a steady-state plasma. This week, scientists working on the Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) announced that they had produced a steady-state high-confinement plasma for 1066 seconds, breaking EAST’s previous 2023 record of 403 seconds.
EAST is an experimental superconducting tokamak fusion device located in Hefei, China. Operated by the Institute of Plasma Physics (AISPP) at the Hefei Institute of Physical Science, it began operations in 2006. It is the first tokamak to contain a deuterium plasma using superconducting niobium-titanium toroidal and poloidal magnets.
EAST has recently undergone several upgrades, notably with new plasma diagnostic tools and a doubling in the power of the plasma heating system. EAST is also acting as a testbed for the ITER fusion reactor that is currently being built in Cadarache, France.
The EAST tokamak is able to maintain a plasma in the so-called “H‐mode”. This is the high-confinement regime that modern tokamaks, including ITER, employ. It occurs when the plasma undergoes intense heating by a neutral beam and results in a sudden improvement of plasma confinement by a factor of two.
In 2017 scientists at EAST broke the 100 seconds barrier for a steady-state H-mode plasma and then in 2023 achieved a 403 seconds, a world record at the time. On Monday, EAST officials announced that they had almost tipled that time, delivering H-mode operation for 1066 seconds.
ASIPP director Song Yuntao notes that the new record is “monumental” and represents a “critical step” toward realizing a functional fusion reactor. “A fusion device must achieve stable operation at high efficiency for thousands of seconds to enable the self-sustaining circulation of plasma,” he says, “which is essential for the continuous power generation of future fusion plants”.
The post China’s Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak smashes fusion confinement record appeared first on Physics World.
Evolving Language Translator Devices and How AI Will Propel Us into the Future
New candidate emerges for a universal quantum electrical standard
Physicists in Germany have developed a new way of defining the standard unit of electrical resistance. The advantage of the new technique is that because it is based on the quantum anomalous Hall effect rather than the ordinary quantum Hall effect, it does not require the use of applied magnetic fields. While the method in its current form requires ultracold temperatures, an improved version could allow quantum-based voltage and resistance standards to be integrated into a single, universal quantum electrical reference.
Since 2019, all base units in the International System of Units (SI) have been defined with reference to fundamental constants of nature. For example, the definition of the kilogram, which was previously based on a physical artefact (the international prototype kilogram), is now tied to Planck’s constant, h.
These new definitions do come with certain challenges. For example, today’s gold-standard way to experimentally determine the value of h (as well the elementary charge e, another base SI constant) is to measure a quantized electrical resistance (the von Klitzing constant RK = h/e2) and a quantized voltage (the Josephson constant KJ = 2e/h). With RK and KJ pinned down, scientists can then calculate e and h.
To measure RK with high precision, physicists use the fact that it is related to the quantized values of the Hall resistance of a two-dimensional electron system (such as the ones that form in semiconductor heterostructures) in the presence of a strong magnetic field. This quantized change in resistance is known as the quantum Hall effect (QHE), and in semiconductors like GaAs or AlGaAs, it shows up at fields of around 10 Tesla. In graphene, a two-dimensional carbon sheet, fields of about 5 T are typically required.
The problem with this method is that KJ is measured by means of a separate phenomenon known as the AC Josephson effect, and the large external magnetic fields that are so essential to the QHE measurement render Josephson devices inoperable. According to Charles Gould of the Institute for Topological Insulators at the University of Würzburg (JMU), who led the latest research effort, this makes it difficult to integrate a QHE-based resistance standard with the voltage standard.
A way to measure RK at zero external magnetic field
Relying on the quantum anomalous Hall effect (QAHE) instead would solve this problem. This variant of the QHE arises from electron transport phenomena recently identified in a family of materials known as ferromagnetic topological insulators. Such quantum spin Hall systems, as they are also known, conduct electricity along their (quantized) edge channels or surfaces, but act as insulators in their bulk. In these materials, spontaneous magnetization means the QAHE manifests as a quantization of resistance even at weak (or indeed zero) magnetic fields.
In the new work, Gould and colleagues made Hall resistance quantization measurements in the QAHE regime on a device made from V-doped (Bi,Sb)2Te3. These measurements showed that the relative deviation of the Hall resistance from RK at zero external magnetic field is just (4.4 ± 8.7) nΩ Ω−1. The method thus makes it possible to determine RK at zero magnetic field with the needed precision — something Gould says was not previously possible.
The snag is that the measurement only works under demanding experimental conditions: extremely low temperatures (below about 0.05 K) and low electrical currents (below 0.1 uA). “Ultimately, both these parameters will need to be significantly improved for any large-scale use,” Gould explains. “To compare, the QHE works at temperatures of 4.2 K and electrical currents of about 10 uA; making its detection much easier and cheaper to operate.”
Towards a universal electrical reference instrument
The new study, which is detailed in Nature Electronics, was made possible thanks to a collaboration between two teams, he adds. The first is at Würzburg, which has pioneered studies on electron transport in topological materials for some two decades. The second is at the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) in Braunschweig, which has been establishing QHE-based resistance standards for even longer. “Once the two teams became aware of each other’s work, the potential of a combined effort was obvious,” Gould says.
Because the project brings together two communities with very different working methods and procedures, they first had to find a window of operations where their work could co-exist. “As a simple example,” explains Gould, “the currents of ~100 nA used in the present study are considered extremely low for metrology, and extreme care was required to allow the measurement instrument to perform under such conditions. At the same time, this current is some 200 times larger than that typically used when studying topological properties of materials.”
As well as simplifying access to the constants h and e, Gould says the new work could lead to a universal electrical reference instrument based on the QAHE and the Josephson effect. Beyond that, it could even provide a quantum standard of voltage, resistance, and (by means of Ohm’s law) current, all in one compact experiment.
The possible applications of the QAHE in metrology have attracted a lot of attention from the European Union, he adds. “The result is a Europe-wide EURAMET metrology consortium QuAHMET aimed specifically at further exploiting the effect and operation of the new standard at more relaxed experimental conditions.”
The post New candidate emerges for a universal quantum electrical standard appeared first on Physics World.
Mass Poultry Vaccination Could Prevent Bird Flu Spread, but Also Make Virus Evolve
Permafrost Thaw and Wildfires Are Raising CO2 Emissions in Arctic Tundras
Volcanic Blasts May Be to Blame for Strange Blue Rings in Norway’s Trees
Record-Breaking Supersonic Wind Swirls Around Giant Exoplanet’s Equator
- Science Magazine
- Trump hits NIH with ‘devastating’ freezes on meetings, travel, communications, and hiring
Trump hits NIH with ‘devastating’ freezes on meetings, travel, communications, and hiring
The US Has Bird Flu Vaccines. Here’s Why You Can’t Get One
Watch these ‘walking’ corals strut their stuff
This Company Wants to Build a Space Station That Has Artificial Gravity
Personalized miniorgans could speed treatments for rare diseases
Nanocrystals measure tiny forces on tiny length scales
Two independent teams in the US have demonstrated the potential of using the optical properties of nanocrystals to create remote sensors that measure tiny forces on tiny length scales. One team is based at Stanford University and used nanocrystals to measure the micronewton-scale forces exerted by a worm as it chewed bacteria. The other team is based at several institutes and used the photon avalanche effect in nanocrystals to measure sub-nanonewton to micronewton forces. The latter technique could potentially be used to study forces involved in processes such as stem cell differentiation.
Remote sensing of forces at small scales is challenging, especially inside living organisms. Optical tweezers cannot make remote measurements inside the body, while fluorophores – molecules that absorb and re-emit light – can measure forces in organisms, but have limited range, problematic stability or, in the case of quantum dots, toxicity. Nanocrystals with optical properties that change when subjected to external forces offer a way forward.
At Stanford, materials scientist Jennifer Dionne led a team that used nanocrystals doped with ytterbium and erbium. When two ytterbium atoms absorb near-infrared photons, they can then transfer energy to a nearby erbium atom. In this excited state, the erbium can either decay directly to its lowest energy state by emitting red light, or become excited to an even higher-energy state that decays by emitting green light. These processes are called upconversion.
Colour change
The ratio of green to red emission depends on the separation between the ytterbium and erbium atoms, and the separation between the erbium atoms – explains Dionne’s PhD student Jason Casar, who is lead author of a paper describing the Stanford research. Forces on the nanocrystal can change these separations and therefore affect that ratio.
The researchers encased their nanocrystals in polystyrene vessels approximately the size of a E coli bacterium. They then mixed the encased nanoparticles with E coli bacteria that were then fed to tiny nematode worms. To extract the nutrients, the worm’s pharynx needs to break open the bacterial cell wall. “The biological question we set out to answer is how much force is the bacterium generating to achieve that breakage?” explains Stanford’s Miriam Goodman.
The researchers shone near-infrared light on the worms, allowing them to monitor the flow of the nanocrystals. By measuring the colour of the emitted light when the particles reached the pharynx, they determined the force it exerted with micronewton-scale precision.
Meanwhile, a collaboration of scientists at Columbia University, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and elsewhere has shown that a process called photon avalanche can be used to measure even smaller forces on nanocrystals. The team’s avalanching nanoparticles (ANPs) are sodium yttrium fluoride nanocrystals doped with thulium – and were discovered by the team in 2021.
The fun starts here
The sensing process uses a laser tuned off-resonance from any transition from the ground state of the ANP. “We’re bathing our particles in 1064 nm light,” explains James Schuck of Columbia University, whose group led the research. “If the intensity is low, that all just blows by. But if, for some reason, you do eventually get some absorption – maybe a non-resonant absorption in which you give up a few phonons…then the fun starts. Our laser is resonant with an excited state transition, so you can absorb another photon.”
This creates a doubly excited state that can decay radiatively directly to the ground state, producing an upconverted photon. Or, it energy can be transferred to a nearby thulium atom, which becomes resonant with the excited state transition and can excite more thulium atoms into resonance with the laser. “That’s the avalanche,” says Schuck; “We find on average you get 30 or 40 of these events – it’s analogous to a chain reaction in nuclear fission.”
Now, Schuck and colleagues have shown that the exact number of photons produced in each avalanche decreases when the nanoparticle experiences compressive force. One reason is that the phonon frequencies are raised as the lattice is compressed, making non-radiatively decay energetically more favourable.
The thulium-doped nanoparticles decay by emitting either red or near infrared photons. As the force increases, the red dims more quickly, causing a change in the colour of the emitted light. These effects allowed the researchers to measure forces from the sub-nanonewton to the micronewton range – at which point the light output from the nanoparticles became too low to detect.
Not just for forces
Schuck and colleagues are now seeking practical applications of their discovery, and not just for measuring forces.
“We’re discovering that this avalanching process is sensitive to a lot of things,” says Schuck. “If we put these particles in a cell and we’re trying to measure a cellular force gradient, but the cell also happened to change its temperature, that would also affect the brightness of our particles, and we would like to be able to differentiate between those things. We think we know how to do that.”
If the technique could be made to work in a living cell, it could be used to measure tiny forces such as those involved in the extra-cellular matrix that dictate stem cell differentiation.
Andries Meijerink of Utrecht University in the Netherlands believes both teams have done important work that is impressive in different ways. Schuck and colleagues for unveiling a fundamentally new force sensing technique and Dionne’s team for demonstrating a remarkable practical application.
However, Meijerink is sceptical that photon avalanching will be useful for sensing in the short term. “It’s a very intricate process,” he says, adding, “There’s a really tricky balance between this first absorption step, which has to be slow and weak, and this resonant absorption”. Nevertheless, he says that researchers are discovering other systems that can avalanche. “I’m convinced that many more systems will be found,” he says.
Both studies are described in Nature. Dionne and colleagues report their results here, and Schuck and colleagues here.
The post Nanocrystals measure tiny forces on tiny length scales appeared first on Physics World.
IOP president Keith Burnett outlines a ‘pivotal’ year ahead for UK physics
Last year was the year of elections and 2025 is going to be the year of decisions.
After many countries, including the UK, Ireland and the US, went to the polls in 2024, the start of 2025 will see governments at the beginning of new terms, forced to respond swiftly to mounting economic, social, security, environmental and technological challenges.
These issues would be difficult to address at any given time, but today they come amid a turbulent geopolitical context. Governments are often judged against short milestones – the first 100 days or a first budget – but urgency should not come at the cost of thinking long-term, because the decisions over the next few months will shape outcomes for years, perhaps decades, to come. This is no less true for science than it is for health and social care, education or international relations.
In the UK, the first half of the year will be dominated by the government’s spending review. Due in late spring, it could be one of the toughest political tests for UK science, as the implications of the tight spending plans announced in the October budget become clear. Decisions about departmental spending will have important implications for physics funding, from research to infrastructure, facilities and teaching.
One of the UK government’s commitments is to establish 10-year funding cycles for key R&D activities – a policy that could be a positive improvement. Physics discoveries often take time to realise in full, but their transformational nature is indisputable. From fibre-optic communications to magnetic resonance imaging, physics has been indispensable to many of the world’s most impactful and successful innovations.
Emerging technologies, enabled by physicists’ breakthroughs in fields such as materials science and quantum physics, promise to transform the way we live and work, and create new business opportunities and open up new markets. A clear, comprehensive and long-term vision for R&D would instil confidence among researchers and innovators, and long-term and sustainable R&D funding would enable people and disruptive ideas to flourish and drive tomorrow’s breakthroughs.
Alongside the spending review, we are also expecting the publication of the government’s industrial strategy. The focus of the green paper published last year was an indication of how the strategy will place significance on science and technology in positioning the UK for economic growth.
If we don’t recognise the need to fund more physicists, we will miss so many of the opportunities that lie ahead
Physics-based industries are a foundation stone for the UK economy and are highly productive, as highlighted by research commissioned by the Institute of Physics, which publishes Physics World. Across the UK, the physics sector generates £229bn gross value added, or 11% of total UK gross domestic product. It creates a collective turnover of £643bn, or £1380bn when indirect and induced turnover is included.
Labour productivity in physics-based businesses is also strong at £84 300 per worker, per year. So, if physics is not at the heart of this effort, then the government’s mission of economic revival is in danger of failing to get off the launch pad.
A pivotal year
Another of the new government’s policy priorities is the strategic defence review, which is expected to be published later this year. It could have huge implications for physics given its core role in many of the technologies that contribute to the UK’s defence capabilities. The changing geopolitical landscape, and potential for strained relations between global powers, may well bring research security to the front of the national mind.
Intellectual property, and scientific innovation, are some of the UK’s greatest strengths and it is right to secure them. But physics discoveries in particular can be hampered by overzealous security measures. So much of the important work in our discipline comes from years of collaboration between researchers across the globe. Decisions about research security need to protect, not hamper, the future of UK physics research.
This year could also be pivotal for UK universities, as securing their financial stability and future will be one of the major challenges. Last year, the pressures faced by higher education institutions became apparent, with announcements of course closures, redundancies and restructures as a way of saving money. The rise in tuition fees has far from solved the problem, so we need to be prepared for more turbulence coming for the higher education sector.
These things matter enormously. We have heard that universities are facing a tough situation, and it’s getting harder for physics departments to exist. But if we don’t recognise the need to fund more physicists, we will miss so many of the opportunities that lie ahead.
As we celebrate the International Year of Quantum Science and Technology that marks the centenary of the initial development of quantum mechanics by Werner Heisenberg, 2025 is a reminder of how the benefits of physics span over decades.
We need to enhance all the vital and exciting developments that are happening in physics departments. The country wants and needs a stronger scientific workforce – just think about all those individuals who studied physics and now work in industries that are defending the country – and that workforce will be strongly dependent on physics skills. So our priority is to make sure that physics departments keep doing world-leading research and preparing the next generation of physicists that they do so well.
The post IOP president Keith Burnett outlines a ‘pivotal’ year ahead for UK physics appeared first on Physics World.
Chronic Stress Doesn’t Need To Be the New Normal — A Stress Reset Can Help
Why telling bigger stories is the only way to counter misinformation
If aliens came to Earth and tried to work out how we earthlings make sense of our world, they’d surely conclude that we take information and slot it into pre-existing stories – some true, some false, some bizarre. Ominously, these aliens would be correct. You don’t need to ask earthling philosophers, just look around.
Many politicians and influencers, for instance, are convinced that scientific evidence does not tell the reality about, for instance, autism or AIDS, the state of the atmosphere or the legitimacy of elections, or even about aliens. Truth comes to light only when you “know the full story”, which will eventually reveal the scientific data to be deceptive or irrelevant.
To see how this works in practice, suppose you hear someone say that a nearby lab is leaking x picocuries of a radioactive substance, potentially exposing you to y millirems of dose. How do you know if you’re in danger? Well, you’ll instinctively start going through a mental checklist of questions.
Who’s speaking – scientist, politician, reporter or activist? If it’s a scientist, are they from the government, a university, or an environmental or anti-nuclear group? You might then wonder: how trustworthy are the agencies that regulate the substance? Is the lab a good neighbour, or did it cover up past incidents? How much of the substance is truly harmful?
Your answers to all these questions will shape the story you tell yourself. You might conclude: “The lab is a responsible organization and will protect me”. Or perhaps you’ll think: “The lab is a thorn in the side of the community and is probably doing weapons-related work. The leak’s a sign of something far worse.”
Perhaps your story will be: “Those environmentalists are just trying to scare us and the data indicate the leak is harmless”. Or maybe it’ll be: “I knew it! The lab’s sold out, the data are terrifying, and the activists are revealing the real truth”. Such stories determine the meaning of the picocuries and millirems for humans, not the other way around.
Acquiring data
Humans gain a sense of what’s happening in several ways. Three of them, to use philosophical language, are deferential, civic and melodramatic epistemology.
In “deferential epistemology”, citizens habitually take the word of experts and institutions about things like the dangers of x picocuries and exposures of y millirems. In his 1624 book New Atlantis, the philosopher Francis Bacon famously crafted a fictional portrait of an island society where deferential epistemology rules and people instinctively trust the scientific infrastructure.
Earthlings haven’t seen deferential epistemology in a while.
We may think this is how people ought to behave. But Bacon, who was also a politician, understood that deference to experts is not automatic and requires constantly curating the public face of the scientific infrastructure. Earthlings haven’t seen deferential epistemology in a while.
“Civic epistemology”, meanwhile, is how people acquire knowledge in the absence of that curation. Such people don’t necessarily reject experts but hear their voices alongside many others claiming to know best how to pursue our interests and values. Civic epistemology is when we negotiate daily life not by first consulting scientists but by pursuing our concerns with a mix of habit, trust, experience and friendly advice.
We sometimes don’t, in fact, take scientific advice when it collides with how we already behave; we may smoke or drink, for instance, despite warnings not to. Or we might seek guidance from non-scientists about things like the harms of radiation.
Finally, what I call “melodramatic epistemology” draws on the word “melodrama”, a genre of theatre involving extreme plots, obvious villains, emotional appeal, sensational language, and moral outrage (the 1939 film Gone with the Wind comes to mind).
A melodramatic lens can be a powerful and irresistible way for humans to digest difficult and emotionally charged events.
Melodramas were once considered culturally insignificant, but scholars such as Peter Brooks from Yale University have shown that a melodramatic lens can be a powerful and irresistible way for humans to digest difficult and emotionally charged events. The clarity, certainty and passion provided by a melodramatic read on a situation tends to displace the complexities, uncertainties and dispassion of scientific evaluation and evidence.
One example from physics occurred at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory in the late 1990s when activists fought, successfully, for the closing of its National Tritium Labeling Facility (NTLF). As I have written before, the NTLF had successfully developed techniques for medical studies while releasing tritium emissions well below federal and state environmental standards.
Activists, however, used melodramatic epistemology to paint the NTLF’s scientists as villains spreading breast cancer throughout the area, and denounced them as making “a terrorist attack on the citizens of Berkeley”. One activist called the scientists “piano players in a nuclear whorehouse.”
The critical point
The aliens studying us would worry most about melodramatic epistemology. Melodramatic epistemology, though dangerous, is nearly impervious to being altered, for any contrary data, studies and expert judgment are considered to spring from the villain’s allies and therefore to incite rather than allay fear.
Two US psychologists – William Brady from Northwestern University and Molly Crockett from Princeton University – recently published a study of how and why misinformation spreads (Science 386 991). By analyzing data from Facebook and Twitter and by conducting real experiments with participants, they found that sources of misinformation evoke more outrage than trustworthy sources. Worse still, the outrage encourages us to share the misinformation even if we haven’t fully read the original source.
This makes it hard to counter misinformation. As the authors tactfully conclude: “Outrage-evoking misinformation may be difficult to mitigate with interventions that assume users want to share accurate information”.
The best, and perhaps only, way to challenge melodramatic stories is to write bigger, more encompassing stories that reveal that a different plot is unfolding.
In my view, the best, and perhaps only, way to challenge melodramatic stories is to write bigger, more encompassing stories that reveal that a different plot is unfolding. Such a story about the NTLF, for instance, would comprise story lines about the benefits of medical techniques, the testing of byproducts, the origin of regulations of toxins, the perils of our natural environment, the nature of fear and its manipulation, and so forth. In such a big story, those who promote melodramatic epistemology show up as an obvious, and dangerous, subplot.
If the aliens see us telling such bigger stories, they might not give up earthlings for lost.
The post Why telling bigger stories is the only way to counter misinformation appeared first on Physics World.